Skip to main content

Security report for osmos.sk

OSMOS s.r.o. · Manufacturing · Slovakia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

OSMOS s.r.o. is a Slovak manufacturing company specializing in the design, production, and servicing of injection molds, with 90% of its production distributed across the European Union. Established in 2004, the company operates multiple business units including toolmaking, plastics injection molding, and software development, as evidenced by its subdomains. The website is built on WordPress using the Elementor framework, indicating a modern and maintainable digital infrastructure. It employs standard web technologies including Google Analytics for visitor tracking and Cookiebot for cookie consent management, demonstrating awareness of privacy compliance requirements. Security measures such as HTTPS, DNSSEC, and Google reCAPTCHA are implemented, reflecting a good security posture. However, the absence of explicit privacy policy, terms of service, and incident response contact information represents gaps in compliance and transparency. Overall, the website is professional, secure, and trustworthy, serving a B2B audience in the manufacturing sector.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching osmos.sk

This scan found 23 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
100
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a key player in the manufacturing sector, focusing on injection mold production and servicing. Its diversified business model includes design, toolmaking, plastics processing, and software, targeting industrial clients across the EU. The long domain age and consistent WHOIS data support its established market presence. The use of multiple subdomains suggests operational segmentation and specialization. The website content and structured data reinforce the company's manufacturing focus and regional market. While contact details are not explicitly found in the analyzed content, the presence of a career page and support for multiple languages indicates a medium-sized enterprise with growth potential and international reach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enforced, DNSSEC enabled, and integration of Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate bot traffic. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, providing users control over cookie categories, which aligns with GDPR requirements. However, the lack of published privacy and security policies, absence of incident response contacts, and no visible security.txt file limit transparency and preparedness for security incidents. Security headers are partially detected or assumed but should be explicitly verified and enhanced. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the provided content. The overall security maturity is good but can be improved by formalizing policies and incident response mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page clearly linked on the website.
  2. Add terms of service and security policy pages to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  3. Implement a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and incident reporting.
  4. Enhance HTTP security headers explicitly, including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and data protection officer if applicable.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
OSMOS s.r.o.
Description
Naša spoločnosť má obchodno-výrobné zameranie. S hlavním zameraním na výrobu a servis vstrekovacích foriem. 90% výroby putuje do celej EU.
Key services
Design, Toolmaking, Injection molding, Software
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.7.1, Elementor 3.25.10, Google Analytics, Cookiebot, Google reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • DNSSEC enabled
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress with Elementor builder
  2. Cookie consent implemented via Cookiebot with detailed cookie categories
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found
  4. Multiple subdomains indicate diversified business units
  5. Google Analytics used with consent denied by default but can be enabled
  6. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in provided content
  7. Structured data present with organization and webpage schema
  8. HTTPS and DNSSEC enabled, indicating good security posture
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform with Elementor page builder, ensuring ease of content management and responsive design. It uses Google Fonts and integrates Google Analytics and Cookiebot for analytics and privacy compliance. Hosting is provided by websupport.sk, a reputable Slovak hosting provider. Performance is moderate with caching plugins indicated by minified CSS and JS files. Accessibility is basic but present, with skip links and ARIA roles. SEO is supported by meta tags, Open Graph, Twitter cards, and structured JSON-LD data. The site is mobile optimized and uses lazy loading for images. Technical risks are minimal but could be reduced by improving security headers and formalizing privacy and security documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with osmos.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review osmos.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.