Skip to main content

Security report for oslomilsamfund.no

Oslo Militære Samfund · Government · Norway

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Oslo Militære Samfund is a longstanding Norwegian military society established in 1825, offering lectures, discussions, publications, and social gatherings primarily for officers, non-commissioned officers, and defense enthusiasts. The organization positions itself as a hub for knowledge and camaraderie within the defense community, providing membership services and hosting events. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting a specialized audience interested in military and defense topics. Technically, the website is built using modern web technologies including Next.js and Sanity CMS, with integration of Fathom Analytics for privacy-conscious visitor tracking. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, though performance is moderate. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced, but could be improved by adding security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy verification, but the website content and professional presentation support its authenticity. Contact information is clearly provided, including a company email and phone number, along with social media presence on Facebook and Twitter. No signs of malicious content or blocking mechanisms were detected, indicating full accessibility. Overall, the site is a credible and well-maintained digital presence for Oslo Militære Samfund, though improvements in privacy compliance and security headers would enhance trust and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching oslomilsamfund.no

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Oslo Militære Samfund operates in the government and non-profit sector, focusing on military and defense-related knowledge sharing and community building. Its business model revolves around membership subscriptions, event hosting, and publication distribution. The organization leverages partnerships with entities like Eckbos Legat and Forsvarets Personellservice, indicating a networked ecosystem within the defense community. The website's content and event listings suggest active engagement with its target audience, supporting growth and relevance. The lack of visible revenue streams beyond membership and events is typical for non-profit societies. The organization's long history since 1825 adds to its market credibility and positions it as a key player in Norway's military social landscape.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications, and uses asynchronous loading for scripts to optimize performance. However, it lacks several important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism and terms of service page indicates gaps in privacy and compliance practices. No explicit incident response or security policy information is published, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from implementing additional headers and formal policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to comply with GDPR and improve user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a terms of service page outlining user rights and responsibilities to strengthen legal compliance.
  4. Develop and publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve organizational security posture and trust.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Oslo Militære Samfund
Description
Oslo Militære Samfund tilbyr foredrag, diskusjoner, tidsskrift og selskapelig samvær for offiserer, befal og forsvarsinteresserte.
Key services
foredrag, diskusjoner, tidsskrift, selskapelig samvær, arrangementer, utleie av selskapslokaler
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Sanity CMS, Fathom Analytics
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of async scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Fathom Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Fathom Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to military society and defense interests.
  3. No forms detected in the provided HTML content.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided in the footer.
  5. Social media presence includes Facebook and Twitter (X).
  6. No cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy found.
  7. No terms of service page detected.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  9. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (Next.js, Sanity).
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React-based framework (Next.js) with Sanity CMS for content management, indicating a contemporary and scalable infrastructure. Use of Fathom Analytics reflects a privacy-conscious approach to visitor tracking. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with good SEO metadata and Open Graph tags for social sharing. Performance is moderate, likely due to rich media content and multiple scripts. No CMS-specific vulnerabilities or outdated libraries were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicit in the HTML content. Overall, the technical implementation is solid with room for performance tuning and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with oslomilsamfund.no. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review oslomilsamfund.no.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.