Skip to main content

Security report for osla.sm

Organizzazione Sammarinese degli Imprenditori · Other · San Marino

Partial score · DNS & email only

35/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Organizzazione Sammarinese degli Imprenditori (OSLA) is a mature, small-sized association dedicated to supporting small and medium enterprises (SMEs) across multiple sectors in San Marino, including commerce, tourism, industry, services, craftsmanship, liberal professions, and agriculture. The website serves as an informational and service portal offering consultancy, legal advice, training, and representation for its members. The organization holds a key market position as a representative body for SMEs in San Marino. Technically, the website is built on Drupal 7 with an Apache server and PHP 5.4.16, indicating an outdated technology stack. The site includes modern web features such as responsive design and social media integration but suffers from slow performance and basic SEO and accessibility implementations. Security posture is weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of modern TLS support, despite some security headers being present. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with visible privacy and cookie policies and a consent mechanism, but GDPR compliance is not fully evident. Contact information is limited to a physical address with no direct email or phone contacts displayed. Overall, the site is functional but requires significant improvements in security and technical modernization to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

Checks completed
5of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching osla.sm

This scan found 8 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
50
DNS health
70
Network security
20
Average
35

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

OSLA operates as a multi-sector association focusing on SMEs in San Marino, providing a broad range of services from business start-up consultancy to legal and labor advice, privacy management, and training. Its business model revolves around membership services and advocacy. The organization maintains an active online presence with news updates and social media engagement, indicating ongoing operations and community involvement. The partnership with Rubiko for website management suggests collaboration with local IT service providers. The lack of visible direct contact emails or phone numbers may limit immediate customer engagement. The domain's maturity and consistent registration data support the organization's legitimacy. However, the outdated technology stack and security weaknesses could impact member trust and operational resilience.

Security posture

The website's security posture is currently weak, primarily due to the lack of a valid SSL certificate, which prevents secure HTTPS connections and undermines user trust and data protection. While some security headers like X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options are set, the absence of modern TLS protocols, OCSP stapling, and session resumption mechanisms further degrade security. The use of outdated PHP and Drupal versions increases the risk of vulnerabilities. No published security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms were found, indicating limited security governance. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented, but GDPR compliance is not fully demonstrated. Immediate remediation of SSL issues and platform updates are critical to improving security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS and secure user connections.
  2. Upgrade PHP and Drupal to supported, secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  3. Implement modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or 1.3) and enable OCSP stapling and session resumption for improved security and performance.
  4. Publish clear security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure information to enhance transparency and trust.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by ensuring GDPR requirements are met and clearly communicated, including data retention policies and DPO contact information.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on an Apache server running PHP 5.4.16 and Drupal 7 CMS, both of which are outdated and unsupported, posing security and maintenance risks. The front-end uses jQuery 1.10.2 and FontAwesome for UI elements. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are integrated for tracking and marketing purposes. The site is mobile responsive with basic accessibility features but suffers from slow performance and lacks modern SEO optimizations. The DNS setup is consistent with Telecom Italia San Marino infrastructure. The absence of a valid SSL certificate severely impacts security and user trust. The technical debt is significant, and modernization is recommended to improve security, performance, and maintainability.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with osla.sm. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review osla.sm.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.