Skip to main content

Security report for ortoteka.lv

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website ortoteka.lv is currently inaccessible due to a Cloudflare Turnstile human verification challenge page. This prevents access to any meaningful content, metadata, or business information. The site appears to be protected by Cloudflare's security and performance services, but no direct information about the company, its services, or contact details is available from the accessible content. Due to this, a comprehensive business and security analysis cannot be performed. The lack of accessible WHOIS data further limits the ability to verify domain legitimacy or ownership details. From a technical perspective, the site uses Cloudflare's CDN, security challenge (Turnstile), and analytics beacon services. However, no CMS, frameworks, or additional technologies are detectable due to the blocked content. Security posture is partially indicated by the use of Cloudflare, but no security headers or SSL configuration details are visible. Overall, the site is effectively locked behind a security mechanism that prevents automated or non-human access, which is a strong security posture against automated threats but limits external analysis. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are detectable, which may impact compliance assessments. Strategic recommendations include completing the challenge to access full content for detailed analysis, ensuring visible security headers and privacy policies are published, and verifying domain registration details for trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ortoteka.lv

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
60
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the lack of accessible content and metadata, no direct business intelligence can be derived. The domain name suggests a possible focus on orthopedics or medical supplies in Latvia, but this is speculative. No information on market positioning, revenue streams, or partnerships is available. The site is likely small in size given the minimal accessible data and lack of business disclosures. The use of Cloudflare indicates an intent to protect the site from attacks and ensure performance, which is positive for operational stability.

Security posture

The website employs Cloudflare's Turnstile challenge, indicating a proactive security measure against bots and automated attacks. However, no other security headers or policies are visible, and SSL/TLS configuration details are not accessible. The absence of privacy and cookie policies suggests potential compliance gaps. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not found. Overall, the security posture is moderate due to the WAF presence but lacks transparency and visible best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Complete the Cloudflare Turnstile challenge to enable full content and security analysis.
  2. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Implement and expose standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, etc.) to enhance security posture.
  4. Provide accessible contact and business information to improve credibility and compliance.
  5. Verify and publish WHOIS and domain registration details to support legitimacy and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Cloudflare detected. Website is behind a Cloudflare Turnstile challenge page requiring human verification before access. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare Turnstile, Cloudflare CDN, Cloudflare Insights

Security

Observed score
25/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Cloudflare Insights
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cloudflare Insights
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully blocked by Cloudflare Turnstile challenge.
  2. No business or contact information is accessible on the landing page.
  3. No metadata, structured data, or SEO tags are present in the accessible content.
  4. No forms or input fields are visible except hidden Turnstile response input.
  5. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are detectable.
  6. No emails, phone numbers, or social media links are present.
  7. Website relies on Cloudflare for security and performance.
  8. Unable to perform full content, security, or business analysis due to access restrictions.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted behind Cloudflare, utilizing its CDN, security challenge (Turnstile), and analytics beacon. No CMS or frameworks are detectable from the limited HTML content. The site currently serves a minimal challenge page with no substantive content, forms, or metadata. Performance and SEO cannot be assessed due to content blocking. Mobile optimization and accessibility cannot be evaluated. The technical infrastructure prioritizes security via Cloudflare but at the cost of accessibility for automated analysis.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ortoteka.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ortoteka.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.