Skip to main content

Security report for ortic.se

Ortic AB · Manufacturing · Sweden

Critical risk. 12 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

24/100

Risk levelCritical

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ortic AB is a Swedish manufacturing company specializing in advanced roll forming machinery and related services. With over 40 years of experience, the company positions itself as a trusted expert in the roll forming industry, offering machines, aftermarket products, process optimization, training, and service. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence targeting manufacturing businesses seeking high-quality roll forming solutions. Technically, the site uses a custom CMS with common JavaScript libraries and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for user tracking. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented, indicating awareness of privacy compliance, although no explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages were found. Security posture is moderate with no visible critical vulnerabilities but lacks advanced security headers and incident response information. Overall, the website is accessible, well-structured, and credible, with clear contact information and social media presence supporting trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ortic.se

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
0
Average
24

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ortic AB operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on roll forming technology. Their business model is B2B, selling machinery and providing services such as maintenance, training, and process optimization. The company targets industrial clients requiring precision and efficiency in metal forming processes. The presence of regional partner domains for Finland, Denmark, and English-speaking markets suggests a strategic regional expansion. The DNB credit rating badge and structured contact data enhance credibility. The website content and navigation support a professional image, aiding customer engagement and lead generation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS usage is assumed but not explicitly confirmed in the HTML content. Security headers are not visible in the provided data, and no security or incident response policies are published. The cookie consent mechanism is a positive privacy compliance indicator. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the absence of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy limits transparency. The site would benefit from implementing security headers, publishing security policies, and enhancing incident response readiness to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with HSTS header to ensure secure connections.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency.
  4. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Ortic AB
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ortic AB
Description
Ortic AB is a specialist company offering advanced roll forming machines and solutions focused on higher production and sustainability.
Key services
Roll forming machines, Aftermarket products, Process optimization, Training and education, Service and repair
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.1.1, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, SnapWidget Instagram embed, bjqs slider, FlowType.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking mechanisms.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented with user interaction.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented and consistent.
  5. Social media presence is active and linked.
  6. Use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking.
  7. Structured data (JSON-LD) is implemented for organization and local business.
  8. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  9. DNB credit rating badge indicates financial credibility.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom CMS platform (ePage) with jQuery 2.1.1 and several JavaScript libraries for UI and content management. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are integrated for analytics and tracking. The site includes responsive design elements and mobile navigation menus, indicating good mobile optimization. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected in the HTML content. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by meta tags, Open Graph, Twitter cards, and structured JSON-LD data for organization and local business. There is room for modernization by updating JavaScript libraries and enhancing security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ortic.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ortic.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.