Skip to main content

Security report for ornethd.net

Orne THD · Telecommunications · France

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Orne THD is a local public telecommunications operator based in France, founded in 2015. The company provides fiber optic internet, TV, and telephony services primarily targeting residential and professional customers in specific French departments (54 and 57). The website presents a professional image with clear branding and consistent content focused on its key services. The domain registration data aligns well with the company's founding date and business claims, supporting its legitimacy. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using popular plugins such as LayerSlider and Revolution Slider, with jQuery and Google reCAPTCHA integrated for enhanced user experience and security. The site is moderately performant, mobile-optimized, and SEO-friendly, though accessibility features are basic. Hosting is likely provided by OVH sas, inferred from the registrar information. From a security perspective, the website uses HTTPS and implements Google reCAPTCHA, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are recommended to improve security posture. There is no visible privacy policy, cookie policy, or vulnerability disclosure information, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and best practices. Contact information is clearly provided, but no dedicated security or incident response contacts are found. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional but would benefit from enhanced security measures and compliance documentation to improve user trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ornethd.net

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
25
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Orne THD operates as a niche local public operator in the telecommunications sector, focusing on fiber optic connectivity in select French regions. Its competitive advantage lies in its public operator status and targeted regional service offering. The business model centers on providing high-speed internet, TV, and telephony services to both residential and professional clients. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees for these services. The company maintains a straightforward partnership ecosystem with no visible subsidiaries or parent companies. Growth indicators include a domain age consistent with the founding date and a professional online presence. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to expand compliance transparency and security posture to strengthen market position.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The website benefits from HTTPS encryption and Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate automated abuse. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options exposes potential risks. The lack of published privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is available, limiting transparency and readiness. Data protection practices appear minimal, with no visible data retention or user tracking disclosures. The security culture could be improved by adopting standard security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing relevant policies and contact points for security incidents.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  4. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency.
  5. Add dedicated security incident response contact information to facilitate reporting and response.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Orne THD
Description
Orne THD, opérateur public local, offre des services TV, Internet et téléphonie par fibre optique à Très Haut Débit sur Rombas, Pierrevillers, Marange-Silvange et sur des communes du département 54 et 57.
Key services
Internet access, TV services, Telephony services, Fiber optic connectivity
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, LayerSlider, Revolution Slider, jQuery, Google reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy pages found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided in the header.
  4. Website uses WordPress with popular slider plugins and Google reCAPTCHA.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data; DNSSEC not enabled.
  7. Website content is professional and relevant to telecommunications services.
  8. Domain registration data supports legitimacy and consistency.
Technical notes

Notes

The website infrastructure is based on WordPress CMS with popular slider plugins (LayerSlider, Revolution Slider) and jQuery libraries, indicating a modern but common technology stack. Hosting is likely with OVH sas, a reputable provider. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Technical debt is low but could be improved by updating security configurations and adding accessibility features. Modernization opportunities include enhancing security headers and compliance documentation. Technical risks include potential DNS spoofing due to lack of DNSSEC and exposure to common web vulnerabilities without security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ornethd.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ornethd.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.