Skip to main content

Security report for orlickezahori.eu

Obec Orlické Záhoří · Government · Czech Republic

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.orlickezahori.eu is the official municipal site for the village of Orlické Záhoří in the Czech Republic. It serves as a comprehensive information portal for residents, visitors, and local businesses, providing news, event calendars, administrative contacts, public tenders, and tourism-related content including virtual tours. The site is positioned as a local government resource with a focus on community engagement and transparency. Technically, the website is built on Joomla CMS with Bootstrap 5 for responsive design, integrating third-party libraries such as Awesomplete for search and the Facebook SDK for social media integration. The site demonstrates moderate performance and good mobile optimization but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Security practices include HTTPS and CSRF tokens, but the absence of security headers and privacy/cookie policies indicates room for improvement. From a security perspective, the site shows a basic security posture with no critical vulnerabilities detected in the content. The domain WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is typical for .eu domains, and does not raise trust concerns given the official nature of the site. However, the lack of explicit privacy and cookie policies may pose compliance risks under GDPR. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professionally maintained, serving its intended audience well. Strategic recommendations include enhancing privacy compliance, implementing security headers, and improving accessibility and SEO to strengthen the site's security and user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching orlickezahori.eu

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
40
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website represents a small government entity focused on local community services and tourism promotion. Its market position is that of a trusted municipal authority with a stable user base of residents and visitors. The business model is informational and service-oriented, with no direct revenue streams evident. Partnerships with regional and cross-border entities are highlighted, supporting cultural and tourism initiatives. The site’s content and structure indicate a focus on transparency, community engagement, and regional cooperation. Growth indicators include active event promotion and social media presence. The partnership ecosystem includes local governments and tourism organizations, enhancing the site's credibility and reach.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is basic to moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and CSRF tokens are used in forms, which are positive indicators. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Compliance gaps exist due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which are critical under GDPR. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not evident. Overall, the site would benefit from a formalized security policy and enhanced technical controls to improve resilience and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Regularly update Joomla CMS and all plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users.
  5. Establish an incident response process and publish contact information for security issues.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Obec Orlické Záhoří
Description
Official municipal website providing information about the village Orlické Záhoří, including local news, events, administrative information, projects, and community services.
Key services
Local news and updates, Event announcements, Administrative documents and contacts, Tourism information and virtual tours, Public tenders and projects
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Joomla CMS, Bootstrap 5, Awesomplete, Facebook SDK, FontAwesome
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of CSRF tokens in forms

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a municipal government site for Orlické Záhoří in Czech Republic.
  2. Content is comprehensive for local residents and visitors, including news, events, and administrative info.
  3. No privacy or cookie policy found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. No explicit security headers detected; HTTPS is used but security headers should be improved.
  5. WHOIS data is privacy protected as typical for .eu domains; no suspicious WHOIS patterns.
  6. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram is active.
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content; content is safe for general audiences.
  8. Technical stack is Joomla CMS with Bootstrap and Facebook SDK integration.
  9. No analytics services explicitly detected.
  10. Contact information includes emails and phone numbers related to municipal services.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Joomla CMS with Bootstrap 5 framework, providing a responsive and modern UI. JavaScript libraries include Awesomplete for autocomplete search and Facebook SDK for social media integration. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets, indicating moderate technical complexity. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization indicators. The site lacks advanced SEO metadata and structured data beyond minimal JSON-LD for blog articles. Accessibility is basic, with some ARIA attributes present but no comprehensive compliance. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The technical stack is stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with orlickezahori.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review orlickezahori.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.