Skip to main content

Security report for orlandoeaglessoccer.com

Orlando Eagles · Other · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Orlando Eagles is a small community-focused soccer organization launched in 2023, aiming to use soccer as a tool for youth development and community impact in Orlando, US. The website is built on the Squarespace platform, featuring modern design elements and multimedia content such as videos and images. While the site is visually appealing and mobile-optimized, it lacks critical privacy and cookie policies, as well as explicit contact information, which impacts its overall trustworthiness and compliance posture. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and HSTS, but could benefit from additional security headers and formal incident response details. The absence of WHOIS data raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, although the website content aligns with a legitimate community sports organization. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance, contact transparency, and security best practices are recommended to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching orlandoeaglessoccer.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Orlando Eagles operate as a youth and community soccer organization with a focus on local church partnerships and player development pathways. Their offerings include summer academies, camps for children aged 5-14, group training, and various community engagement programs. The business model appears non-profit or community-oriented, targeting youth and families in the Orlando area. The organization is relatively new, founded in 2023, and maintains a social media presence primarily on Instagram. The website content is consistent and professionally presented, but lacks detailed business credentials or certifications. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the website content or WHOIS data.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good baseline security posture with HTTPS and HSTS enabled, ensuring encrypted communications and protection against protocol downgrade attacks. However, it lacks several recommended security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate risks like cross-site scripting and clickjacking. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The absence of privacy policies and incident response information indicates gaps in compliance and security governance. The WHOIS data unavailability is a concern for domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with enhanced headers, documented policies, and transparent contact channels for security incidents.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  2. Add explicit contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
  3. Enhance security headers by adding Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response policy and contact channels for security issues.
  5. Verify domain registration status and update WHOIS records to improve legitimacy and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Orlando Eagles
Description
The Orlando Eagles launched in 2023 with a passion to use the global environment of soccer to impact the next generation of our city. Rooted in a love for soccer and the people in our city we desire to provide a pathway for young people to grow as athletes and people. This pathway starts with a passion to equip and elevate local churches across our city to use the game we love to impact their surrounding area. This path continues with opportunities for players to further develop in more competitive environments. Wherever you are we would love for you to take a step onto the path and join us as we love our community through a game we love.
Key services
Summer Academy, Camps for ages 5-14, Fall Group Training, REC League, Urban Ministry, Eagles Campus Fellowship, Small Group Training, International Tours, School Programs, ID Camp
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Squarespace, Google Fonts (Poppins, Manrope), Plyr video player
Platforms
Squarespace
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • HSTS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Squarespace platform with modern design and video content
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage
  4. Social media presence limited to Instagram
  5. No security incident or vulnerability disclosure information available
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, raising questions about domain registration status
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on Squarespace, leveraging its CDN and built-in infrastructure. It uses Google Fonts for typography and Plyr for video playback. The site is mobile-optimized and loads multimedia content efficiently, though performance is moderate likely due to large images and video content. Accessibility features are basic, with some semantic HTML and alt attributes present. SEO optimization is minimal with basic meta tags and Open Graph data but lacks structured data beyond simple JSON-LD for website and local business. No advanced frameworks or custom backend technologies are detected. The technical stack is suitable for a small community organization but could be enhanced with better SEO, accessibility, and security practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with orlandoeaglessoccer.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review orlandoeaglessoccer.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.