Skip to main content

Security report for orkla.lv

Orkla Latvija · Manufacturing · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Orkla Latvija is a prominent Latvian food product company managing several beloved local brands such as Laima, Selga, Staburadze, and Ādažu Čipsi. The company emphasizes quality raw materials, brand heritage, and sustainability, operating both manufacturing and retail outlets including the Laima chocolate museum. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and SEO-friendly, built on WordPress with modern technologies like Vue.js and Google Tag Manager for analytics. Security posture is good with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though security headers and explicit incident response information are lacking. WHOIS data was unavailable due to query limits, but the website content and branding strongly indicate a legitimate and established business. Overall, the site reflects a mature digital presence aligned with business goals and compliance requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching orkla.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention orkla.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
21
Employees
0
Customers
10
Third parties
11
Weak passwords
14%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for orkla.lv.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Orkla Latvija holds a leading market position in the Latvian food manufacturing and retail sector, with a portfolio of historic and popular brands. The company invests significantly in production and sustainability, positioning itself as a top employer and tax contributor in the industry. Its business model focuses on branded product manufacturing, retail sales, and cultural engagement through the chocolate museum. The target audience includes Latvian consumers and export markets. The company leverages digital channels for marketing and customer engagement, with a career portal linked to the broader Orkla group. The website content and external links confirm a well-integrated brand ecosystem and strong market presence.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and includes a cookie consent mechanism, indicating awareness of privacy and security best practices. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security or incident response policies represent areas for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML source. The use of Google Tag Manager introduces moderate user tracking. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by adding explicit security policies, security headers, and vulnerability disclosure information.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Add a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure page to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate risks from external libraries.
  5. Enhance contact information with verified company emails and phone numbers for customer and security inquiries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Orkla Latvija
Description
Orkla Latvija is a leading branded food products company in Latvia, managing and developing popular local brands such as Laima, Selga, Staburadze, Ādažu Čipsi, Spilva, and Gutta. The company emphasizes high-quality raw materials and preserving brand values. It also operates the Laima chocolate museum and Laima confectionery stores.
Key services
Food product manufacturing, Retail confectionery stores, Brand management
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.2.6, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery 3.6.4, Google Tag Manager, Vue.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics
  • Cookie consent mechanism present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Latvian language.
  2. Strong focus on local Latvian food brands with historical significance.
  3. Good SEO and structured data implementation.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy present indicating GDPR compliance.
  5. No visible security headers detected in HTML source.
  6. No explicit security or incident response contact information found.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no suspicious indicators found in website content.
  8. Multiple external links to official brand sites and social media profiles.
  9. Use of modern web technologies including WordPress and Vue.js.
  10. Google Tag Manager used for analytics and tracking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.2.6 with Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery, and Vue.js for interactive components. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive images and accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA roles. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. SEO is well-implemented with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. No hosting provider or CDN information was identified from the HTML source. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly experience but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with orkla.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review orkla.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.