Skip to main content

Security report for orange4it.lv

SIA Orange 4 IT · Government · Latvia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Orange 4 IT is a Latvian IT company specializing in delivering IT solutions and systems tailored for effective and successful management of state institutions and municipalities. The company emphasizes quality, efficiency, and experience in large IT projects, particularly in the public sector. Their business model focuses on providing customized software development and consulting services, leveraging Agile Scrum methodologies to enhance project efficiency and client satisfaction. The website presents a professional image with clear contact information and a focus on government clients. Technically, the website is built using the Framer platform, hosted on Framer's infrastructure, and employs modern web fonts and design principles. However, the site lacks advanced security headers and explicit cookie consent mechanisms, which are areas for improvement. The security posture is moderate, with no visible vulnerabilities but missing some best practices. Overall, the company appears legitimate and focused on a niche market with a small team and specialized expertise.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching orange4it.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
40
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a trusted IT partner for Latvian government and municipal institutions, highlighting a proven and refined work process, experienced specialists, and compatible software solutions. Their use of Agile Scrum indicates a modern approach to project management, aiming for up to 30% increased efficiency. The business targets public sector clients, offering tailored IT solutions that integrate seamlessly with existing systems. The presence of clear contact details and a professional website supports credibility. The company is small-sized, with no parent or subsidiary companies indicated. Partnerships include Itero, a Latvian digital agency responsible for website creation. Revenue streams likely come from project-based contracts and consulting services. Growth potential is tied to public sector IT modernization initiatives.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS implied but no explicit security headers detected in the HTML content. There is no dedicated security policy or incident response information available. Privacy and cookie policies are present in text form but lack interactive consent mechanisms. No vulnerability disclosures or security certifications are mentioned. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust analysis. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, suitable for a small IT service provider but with room for enhancements in transparency and technical safeguards. Recommendations include implementing security headers, cookie consent banners, and publishing security policies to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Add a visible cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Obtain and display relevant security certifications or compliance attestations.
  5. Improve WHOIS data availability and domain registration transparency to strengthen legitimacy.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA Orange 4 IT
Registration number
40203443525
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Orange 4 IT
Description
IT risinājumi un sistēmas efektīvai un veiksmīgai valsts institūciju un pašvaldību pārvaldei.
Key services
IT solutions delivery, Software development, Consulting for public sector, Agile Scrum project management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Framer (website builder), Inter font, Funnel Display font
Frameworks
Framer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Framer events
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
framer.com events script
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is in Latvian, targeting Latvian government and municipal clients.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banners, but privacy and cookie policies are described in footer text.
  4. No visible forms on the homepage; contact is via email link.
  5. No social media links detected.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  7. Website uses Framer platform and hosting.
  8. No visible security headers or advanced security policies.
  9. Contact information is clear and professional.
  10. No signs of suspicious or malicious content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Framer platform, utilizing modern web fonts like Inter and Funnel Display for typography. It uses Framer's hosting and content delivery network (framerusercontent.com). The site loads multiple images optimized for different screen sizes and employs asynchronous JavaScript for event tracking. The design is responsive and visually consistent, with good mobile optimization. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph data present but no structured JSON-LD schema detected. Accessibility features are minimal but present. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. Technical risks include lack of security headers and limited privacy controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with orange4it.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review orange4it.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.