Skip to main content

Security report for orange-box.network

ORANGE-BOX.network · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ORANGE-BOX.network is a specialized German service provider offering advanced event network technology solutions including WLAN, fiber optic networks, and bonding technologies for large-scale events such as festivals, congresses, and trade fairs. The company targets event organizers primarily in major German cities and positions itself as a niche provider delivering scalable, high-availability network infrastructures. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear contact information and GDPR-compliant privacy and cookie policies. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though some security headers and explicit policies are absent. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-maintained, though WHOIS data is unavailable due to TLD restrictions, slightly reducing domain trust signals.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  4. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching orange-box.network

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
25
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
80
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology and telecommunications sectors, focusing on event network infrastructure. Its business model revolves around providing modular, scalable network solutions and remote management services for large events. The website content and service offerings suggest a small-sized enterprise with a clear market niche. The presence of multiple German city locations indicates regional coverage. The company leverages partnerships with technology vendors like Cisco and uses professional-grade equipment. The use of GDPR-compliant tools and cookie consent mechanisms reflects awareness of regulatory requirements. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The business appears to maintain a professional online presence with moderate digital marketing and analytics integration.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms, indicating baseline security and privacy compliance. However, no advanced security headers (e.g., CSP, X-Frame-Options) were detected, and no public security or incident response policies are available. The site uses standard WordPress plugins, which require regular updates to mitigate vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities were found in the HTML content. The absence of a security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy limits transparency for security researchers. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing additional HTTP security headers and publishing formal security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a public security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to reduce vulnerability risks.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide more comprehensive content to improve user experience and SEO.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ORANGE-BOX.network
Description
ORANGE-BOX.network bietet WLAN, Glasfaser Event-Netzwerktechnik und 4G/5g/Starlink-Bonding für Festivals, Kongresse, Messen und andere Events
Key services
WLAN for events, Fiber optic network construction and rental, Switching and routing, 4G/5G/Starlink bonding, Network monitoring, Remote network administration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Contact Form 7, Complianz GDPR Cookie Consent, Font Awesome 5.15.3
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Marketing tools
Google Site Kit
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is primarily in German targeting event network services in Germany.
  3. No WHOIS data available due to unsupported TLD WHOIS query.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented and GDPR compliant.
  5. No explicit security policies or incident response info publicly available.
  6. Uses standard WordPress plugins and Google analytics/tracking tools.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  8. Contact information is clearly presented with company domain emails and phone numbers.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.3 with a modern tech stack including jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Contact Form 7, and Complianz GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The site uses Font Awesome for icons and is optimized for mobile devices with responsive design. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Accessibility is basic but functional. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site uses Google services for analytics and advertising, indicating integration with common marketing tools. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security headers and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with orange-box.network. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review orange-box.network.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.