Skip to main content

Security report for opzp.cz

Operační program Životní prostředí · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Operační program Životní prostředí is a Czech government-funded grant program focused on environmental protection and sustainability projects, supported by European Union funds. The program offers over 60 billion CZK for projects in energy savings, renewable energy, climate adaptation, water infrastructure, waste management, and nature protection. The website serves as an authoritative portal for grant information, application guidance, and project showcases, targeting municipalities, businesses, and organizations engaged in environmental initiatives. Technically, the website is built on WordPress CMS with modern frontend technologies and uses Active24 as registrar and likely hosting provider. It features good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices. Google Analytics is used for minimal user tracking with a clear cookie consent mechanism. The site is secured with HTTPS and shows good SSL configuration, though some security headers could be improved. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates a solid posture with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, it lacks explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms such as security.txt. Privacy compliance is strong with comprehensive privacy and cookie policies aligned with GDPR requirements. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-maintained, reflecting the legitimacy and importance of the government program it represents. Strategic improvements in security headers and incident response transparency could further enhance its security posture.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of opzp.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching opzp.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The program holds a strong market position as an official government initiative with significant EU funding, targeting environmental sustainability sectors. Its business model revolves around grant distribution to eligible projects, supporting energy efficiency, renewable energy, climate adaptation, water and waste management, and nature conservation. The target customers include municipalities, businesses, and non-profit organizations in the Czech Republic. The program benefits from partnerships with the Ministry of the Environment, State Environmental Fund, and Nature Conservation Agency, enhancing its operational ecosystem. Growth indicators include ongoing calls for proposals and expanding project portfolios. The website's comprehensive content and social media presence support effective stakeholder engagement and transparency.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent mechanisms, and no visible sensitive data leaks. The absence of critical vulnerabilities and use of reputable hosting and registrar services contribute positively. However, the lack of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure channels represents a compliance gap. Security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not explicitly detected and should be implemented to mitigate risks like clickjacking and content injection. Regular updates of WordPress and plugins are essential to maintain security. Overall, the site is secure but could improve transparency and defense-in-depth measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information prominently on the website.
  3. Create and maintain a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
  4. Regularly audit and update all CMS components and third-party scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance user privacy by reviewing third-party analytics and ensuring minimal data retention.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Operační program Životní prostředí
Description
Dotační program umožňuje čerpat v letech 2021–2027 z Evropského fondu pro regionální rozvoj a Fondu soudržnosti více než 60 mld. Kč na projekty v oblasti ochrany životního prostředí.
Key services
Grant funding for environmental projects, Support for energy savings, Support for renewable energy sources, Adaptation to climate change, Water infrastructure projects, Waste management, Nature and pollution protection
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, JavaScript, CSS, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Kadence Blocks
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a government-funded environmental grant program for Czech Republic.
  2. Content is comprehensive, professionally presented, and well-structured.
  3. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  4. Good privacy and cookie policy implementation with consent mechanism.
  5. Uses WordPress CMS with modern frontend technologies.
  6. Includes social media presence on official channels.
  7. No visible security policy or incident response contact details.
  8. No terms of service page detected.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, leveraging Kadence Blocks for layout and styling. It uses minified CSS and JavaScript for performance optimization. Hosting and domain registration are managed by Active24 and Websupport, reputable Czech providers. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. Google Analytics is integrated asynchronously with consent denied by default, indicating privacy-conscious implementation. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement by further optimizing assets and caching strategies. No deprecated or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 69/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with opzp.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review opzp.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.