Skip to main content

Security report for optoman.eu

Optoman · Technology · N/a

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Optoman is a specialized manufacturer focused on application-optimized dielectric thin film coatings and high-power laser optics, targeting photonics professionals and researchers. The company operates a professionally designed website built on WordPress with WooCommerce, integrating modern analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Hotjar, and Cookiebot for privacy compliance. The website demonstrates good technical maturity with HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent mechanisms, though it lacks explicit privacy and terms of service policies as well as direct contact information. Security posture is solid with no evident vulnerabilities, but could be improved by adding explicit security headers and incident response contacts. The absence of WHOIS data raises concerns about domain registration transparency, suggesting the use of privacy protection or recent registration. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced compliance and transparency measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching optoman.eu

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
95
Average
50
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention optoman.eu, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for optoman.eu right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Optoman occupies a niche market in the technology sector, manufacturing high damage threshold laser optics and dielectric coatings. The business model centers on product design, development, and manufacturing for specialized photonic applications. The website content and structured data indicate a small-sized company with consistent branding and good content quality. The company leverages multiple marketing and analytics platforms to engage its target audience. However, the lack of publicly available WHOIS data and contact details limits full trust and verification. No partnerships or subsidiaries are explicitly identified. The company appears to focus on direct sales and industry reputation.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and employs several security best practices including reCAPTCHA and cookie consent management. Security headers are not explicitly visible but likely present given the modern setup. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement in security governance and transparency. GDPR compliance is partially addressed via Cookiebot but lacks a comprehensive privacy policy. Overall, the security posture is good but not comprehensive.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Add explicit security headers such as X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy to enhance protection.
  3. Implement and publish a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security and incident response contacts to improve transparency.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet broader compliance and usability standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Optoman
Description
OPTOMAN manufactures application-optimized dielectric thin film coatings and high-power laser optics.
Key services
Design, Development, Manufacturing of laser optics, Dielectric thin film coatings
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, LiteSpeed Cache, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Hotjar, Cookiebot, reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
WooCommerce
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for bot protection
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content and no blocking detected.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the homepage or metadata.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed cookie categories and provider info.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the visible content or metadata.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools is evident.
  6. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which reduces trust in domain registration transparency.
  7. Website uses HTTPS and includes multiple security and privacy tools.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce, using LiteSpeed Cache for performance optimization. It integrates Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight, and Cookiebot for analytics and privacy management. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. No critical technical debt or outdated libraries were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional online presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with optoman.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review optoman.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.