Skip to main content

Security report for opservis.com

Opservis systems SIA · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Opservis systems SIA operates as an import and export company based in Riga, Latvia. The company presents itself through a website built on the Wix platform, offering basic information about its business activities. The website is modest in content and design, targeting a general audience interested in import/export services. The company’s market position and detailed business model are not explicitly stated, suggesting a small-scale operation. Technical infrastructure relies on Wix hosting and standard Wix technologies, with no advanced frameworks or third-party integrations detected. The site is mobile-optimized and uses HTTPS, ensuring basic security and accessibility standards. However, the absence of privacy policies, cookie consent mechanisms, and terms of service indicates limited compliance with modern data protection regulations. Security posture is moderate, with HTTPS enabled but lacking explicit security headers and incident response information. The WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, raising concerns about domain legitimacy and registration consistency. Overall, the website reflects a small business with basic digital presence but requires improvements in security, compliance, and trust indicators.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching opservis.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention opservis.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for opservis.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company appears to be a small import/export business operating in Latvia, with no clear indication of subsidiaries or parent companies. The business model focuses on trade services, but lacks detailed descriptions or market positioning. The website does not showcase partnerships, certifications, or customer testimonials, limiting insights into competitive advantages or growth indicators. The absence of email contacts and social media presence suggests limited digital marketing efforts. The company relies on Wix for website hosting and content management, indicating a cost-effective approach to online presence. Strategic observations highlight the need for enhanced transparency, compliance, and digital marketing to improve credibility and market reach.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, which is a fundamental security measure. JavaScript includes some security hardening for fetch and XHR requests, indicating awareness of client-side security. However, no security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. There is no evidence of privacy policies, cookie consent, or incident response contacts, which are critical for GDPR and other regulatory compliance. The missing WHOIS registration data is a significant red flag, potentially indicating domain registration issues or privacy protection that is not justified. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were found in the content. Overall, the security posture is basic and requires enhancements to meet industry best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Register the domain properly and ensure WHOIS data is accurate and publicly available to improve legitimacy.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Implement security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen web security.
  4. Add contact information for incident response and security reporting to enhance trust and readiness.
  5. Improve website content quality, including business descriptions, certifications, and customer testimonials to boost credibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Opservis systems SIA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Opservis systems SIA
Description
Import & Export company
Key services
Import, Export
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Wix.com Website Builder, core-js polyfill, focus-within-polyfill
Platforms
Wix
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security-related JavaScript overrides to harden fetch and XHR

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Wix platform with standard Wix scripts and styles.
  2. No WHOIS registration data found for the domain.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected.
  4. Contact information limited to phone and postal address in structured data.
  5. No email addresses or social media links found.
  6. No forms detected in the HTML content.
  7. No security headers explicitly detected in provided data.
  8. HTTPS is used, indicating basic SSL configuration.
  9. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  10. Content is minimal and business-focused on import/export.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Wix platform, utilizing Wix’s standard JavaScript libraries and polyfills for compatibility. The site uses HTTPS and includes some client-side security hardening scripts. Performance is moderate, with no heavy third-party analytics or advertising scripts detected, which reduces tracking and potential attack surface. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic and could be improved. SEO optimization is minimal, with basic meta tags and Open Graph data present. The lack of privacy and cookie policies, as well as security headers, indicates technical debt in compliance and security implementation. The domain’s WHOIS data is missing, which is a critical technical and trust issue. Overall, the technical infrastructure is simple and functional but requires modernization and compliance improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with opservis.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review opservis.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.