Skip to main content

Security report for opsecsecurity.com

OpSec Security · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

OpSec Security is a leading provider of integrated online protection and on-product authentication solutions targeting brands and governments. The company offers a comprehensive portfolio of services including brand protection, licensing, compliance, and supply chain transparency. Their market position is strong with a focus on technology-driven solutions and partnerships with subsidiaries such as Crane Authentication and Global Trim. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with modern technologies and good user experience. Security posture is robust with HTTPS, security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities, though explicit security policy and incident response information are absent. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a notable anomaly that slightly reduces trust but does not detract from the overall legitimacy based on content and branding. Strategic recommendations include publishing detailed security policies and incident response contacts to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching opsecsecurity.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
75
Email security
80
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

OpSec Security operates in the technology and government sectors, providing brand protection and authentication services. Their business model is B2B, focusing on enterprises and government clients. The company leverages a portfolio of technology platforms and partnerships to deliver solutions addressing counterfeit, infringement, and compliance challenges. The website content and linked partner domains indicate a well-established ecosystem. Growth indicators include recent product launches like InsightPulse™ and collaborations with intellectual property firms like Zacco. The company maintains a professional online presence with comprehensive policies and social media engagement, supporting a high level of business credibility.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and multiple security headers, indicating a good security baseline. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Forms are limited to search and contact, with no indication of insecure data handling. However, the absence of a public security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests room for improvement in transparency and readiness. The company holds ISO 27001 certification, which supports their security maturity. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced by publishing more detailed security governance information.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page detailing security governance and controls.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ emails.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Add data protection officer contact information to demonstrate GDPR compliance.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate supply chain risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
OpSec Security
Description
OpSec Security is the leading provider of integrated online protection and on-product authentication solutions for brands and governments.
Key services
Online protection, On-product authentication, Brand management, Licensing, Merchandising, Engagement marketing, Compliance, Supply chain transparency
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Avada Theme, Slider Revolution, Google Tag Manager, SecurePrivacy plugin, Smartlook, FontAwesome, Typekit Fonts
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure forms with search inputs
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security/privacy plugins

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), Smartlook
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Smartlook, SecurePrivacy
Marketing tools
Smartlook
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  3. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual
  4. Strong presence of privacy and terms policies
  5. Multiple partner and subsidiary domains linked
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  7. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Avada theme and Slider Revolution plugin, supported by modern web fonts and icon libraries. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Smartlook for analytics and user behavior tracking, alongside a privacy management plugin. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. The technical stack is current and well-maintained, though hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site uses secure HTTPS connections and implements standard SEO and accessibility best practices, contributing to a professional and reliable digital infrastructure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with opsecsecurity.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review opsecsecurity.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.