Skip to main content

Security report for opi-tpp.pl

Government · Poland

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.opi-tpp.pl serves as a publicly accessible information system focused on post-mining and post-industrial areas within the Silesian Voivodeship in Poland. It appears to be a government or public sector initiative aimed at providing regional stakeholders and residents with relevant data about these lands. The site uses modern web technologies including Angular, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management, indicating a reasonable level of digital maturity. The presence of a detailed cookie consent mechanism and privacy policy hosted by Cookiebot reflects good privacy compliance practices. However, the absence of explicit contact information, terms of service, and security policies suggests areas for improvement in transparency and user trust. The domain WHOIS data is not publicly available, which is typical for .pl domains or privacy-protected registrations, and does not raise immediate concerns given the site's nature and content. Overall, the site is professionally designed, accessible, and safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching opi-tpp.pl

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
45
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform targets a niche audience interested in environmental and land use information related to mining legacy in the Silesian region. Its business model is informational and likely government-funded or supported. The use of reputable third-party services such as Cookiebot and Google Analytics indicates a partnership ecosystem focused on compliance and analytics. The lack of visible commercial elements or contact details suggests the site is not revenue-driven but serves a public good. Growth indicators and market positioning are limited due to the specialized nature of the service. The site’s consistent branding and good content quality support its credibility within its sector.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent mechanism that grants security storage. However, no explicit HTTP security headers were detected in the provided data, and no security or incident response policies are published. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries in the HTML content. The site would benefit from publishing a security policy, incident response contacts, and implementing additional security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options. The absence of these elements slightly reduces the overall security maturity but does not indicate critical vulnerabilities.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive HTTP security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options).
  2. Publish clear terms of service and security policy pages to enhance transparency.
  3. Add explicit contact information including security incident response channels.
  4. Regularly audit and update SSL/TLS configurations to maintain strong encryption standards.
  5. Enhance SEO and accessibility features to improve user experience and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Ogólnodostępny system informacyjny o terenach pogórniczych i poprzemysłowych na terenie województwa śląskiego.
Key services
Information system about post-mining and post-industrial areas in Silesian Voivodeship
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Angular, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, UserWay Accessibility Widget, Material Icons, Roboto font
Frameworks
Angular
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • Security storage granted in consent

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdWords
Tracking pixels
Google Ads audiences pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. No WHOIS data available from NASK registry for this domain
  3. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed categories and granular controls
  4. No explicit contact information or business registration details found on the site
  5. No terms of service or security policy pages detected
  6. Site uses modern Angular framework and Google Tag Manager
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected
  8. No social media or direct contact emails found in the HTML content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Angular framework, leveraging Google Tag Manager for analytics and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. It uses Material Icons and Roboto fonts for UI consistency. The site appears mobile-optimized and accessible, with a responsive design and accessibility widgets integrated. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and styles. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced SEO metadata and security header implementation. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the site's informational purpose effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with opi-tpp.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review opi-tpp.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.