Skip to main content

Security report for opexltd.com

Other · N/a

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website opexltd.com is currently inactive and displays a domain expired placeholder page hosted by Hostinger. No business-related content, contact information, or policies are available, indicating the site is not operational. The technical infrastructure relies on legacy Bootstrap 3.3.7 and jQuery 3.2.1 libraries, with Google Analytics and Tag Manager scripts embedded despite the lack of active content. Security posture is weak due to domain expiration, absence of HTTPS enforcement, and missing security headers or policies. Overall, the site presents a high risk for trust and credibility, requiring domain renewal and comprehensive redevelopment to restore functionality and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching opexltd.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
45
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

No business intelligence can be derived from the current website content as it solely serves as a domain expired notice. There is no information on market positioning, services, or company operations. The presence of Hostinger branding suggests hosting by this provider but no direct business relationship or partnerships are evident. The lack of contact details or corporate identifiers limits any assessment of business model or growth potential.

Security posture

The security posture is critically weak. The domain expiration means the website is offline, exposing the brand to reputational risk. No HTTPS enforcement or security headers are detected, and no privacy or cookie policies exist. The embedded analytics scripts may collect user data without consent, violating privacy regulations. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are absent. Immediate renewal of the domain and implementation of security best practices are necessary to mitigate risks.

Recommendations

  1. Renew the domain registration immediately to restore website availability.
  2. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and enforce secure connections.
  3. Develop and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies compliant with GDPR.
  4. Add clear contact information and establish incident response channels.
  5. Update technology stack to current versions and audit for vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website is currently inactive due to domain expiration. No business description or services are available.
Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 3.3.7, jQuery 3.2.1, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
10/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a domain expired placeholder page hosted by Hostinger.
  2. No business or contact information is present.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or security policies found.
  4. Uses outdated Bootstrap 3.3.7 and jQuery 3.2.1 libraries.
  5. Google Analytics and Tag Manager scripts are included despite no active content.
  6. No HTTPS enforcement visible in HTML content; SSL status unknown.
  7. External links point mainly to Hostinger services and Google domains.
  8. No forms or data collection fields present.
  9. No social media or contact emails/phone numbers found.
  10. No structured data (JSON-LD) or Open Graph metadata present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses outdated Bootstrap 3.3.7 and jQuery 3.2.1 libraries, which may have known vulnerabilities. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are integrated but serve no purpose on a placeholder page. Hosting is provided by Hostinger, as indicated by branding and links. The site lacks modern SEO and accessibility features, and mobile optimization is basic. No CMS or advanced frameworks are detected. The expired domain status prevents normal operation and content delivery.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with opexltd.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review opexltd.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.