Skip to main content

Security report for opentracker.net

Opentracker · E-commerce · Netherlands

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Opentracker is a specialized SaaS platform focused on providing e-commerce marketers with automated customer journey reporting and attribution analytics. The company positions itself as a solution to help businesses understand revenue drivers and optimize marketing efforts. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with modern technologies such as Gatsby, React, and integration with major marketing and analytics tools like Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel. The site is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and provides rich content including testimonials and case studies, indicating a solid market position with over 800 companies using their services. However, the absence of WHOIS domain registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and transparency. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities, but lacks explicit security policies and comprehensive privacy and cookie disclosures. Overall, the business appears credible and professional but would benefit from improved transparency and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching opentracker.net

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Opentracker operates in the e-commerce analytics sector, targeting marketers and e-commerce teams seeking to optimize sales and marketing ROI through data-driven insights. Their business model is subscription-based SaaS with a focus on customer journey automation and attribution. The company emphasizes direct access to data analytics experts and dedicated customer success, which differentiates it from competitors. The presence of multiple integrations with platforms like Amazon, Google Data Studio, and Power BI suggests a flexible ecosystem approach. Testimonials from reputable companies and case studies reinforce their market credibility. The lack of detailed company founding information and missing WHOIS data are notable gaps. The company is headquartered in The Netherlands and serves a medium-sized client base.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with good SSL configuration and uses standard security practices such as asynchronous loading of tracking scripts. However, it lacks visible security headers like Content-Security-Policy and does not publish a security policy or incident response contact information. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Privacy compliance is minimal with no explicit privacy or cookie policies found on the main site, which could pose compliance risks under GDPR or similar regulations. The absence of WHOIS data reduces trust in domain legitimacy. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by adding formal policies, security headers, and transparent compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection.
  3. Provide a public security policy and incident response contact to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Clarify domain registration details and ensure WHOIS data is available or justified if privacy protected.
  5. Enhance advertising transparency by disclosing tracking and data usage practices more explicitly.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Opentracker
Description
Opentracker is dedicated towards making life easier for e-commerce marketers, understand your attribution data with just a few clicks. Generating sales is a good thing. Knowing what drives revenue is better. Opentracker is the best platform to automate Customer Journey reporting.
Key services
Customer Journey reporting, Attribution data analysis, Custom dashboards, Integration with multiple data sources and platforms, Dedicated customer success and data analytics support
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Gatsby, React, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager, Marketing Automation (KOI), JavaScript ES Modules
Frameworks
Gatsby
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Facebook Pixel and Google Analytics with async loading
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
KOI Marketing Automation, Calendly
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found on main page HTML.
  3. Contact information limited to support email in JSON-LD; no phone numbers found.
  4. Strong focus on e-commerce customer journey analytics with professional branding.
  5. Multiple integrations and testimonials indicate established business relationships.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and marketing tools.
  7. No security policy or incident response information publicly visible.
  8. WHOIS data missing, which is a concern for domain legitimacy verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Gatsby, a modern React-based static site generator, ensuring fast performance and good SEO. It integrates multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager, and a marketing automation service (KOI). The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features. No CMS other than Gatsby is detected. Hosting provider details are not explicit. The technical implementation is modern and efficient, supporting a professional user experience. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and compliance-related technical implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 70/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with opentracker.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review opentracker.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.