Skip to main content

Security report for openthebooks.com

Open The Books · Government · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Open The Books is a well-established non-profit organization focused on government transparency and accountability by providing access to extensive public expenditure data. The website is professionally designed with excellent content quality, targeting taxpayers, journalists, and researchers interested in government spending. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript frameworks and libraries such as AngularJS and jQuery, with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and use of request verification tokens, though the absence of explicit security headers and cookie consent mechanisms are areas for improvement. The lack of WHOIS registration data introduces some uncertainty about domain legitimacy, but the strong media presence and transparent business model support trustworthiness. Overall, the site is a valuable resource with moderate risk and room for enhanced security and privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching openthebooks.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention openthebooks.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
158
Employees
0
Customers
158
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
6%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for openthebooks.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the government and non-profit sectors, providing a unique service of aggregating and publishing government spending data. Its business model relies on transparency advocacy, investigative journalism, and public engagement through newsletters and reports. The site is positioned as a leader in its niche with a significant data repository and media recognition. Partnerships with donation platforms and newsletter hosts support its funding and outreach. The target audience includes public watchdogs, media, and citizens seeking accountability. Growth potential lies in expanding data coverage and enhancing user engagement tools.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and use of anti-CSRF tokens in AJAX requests. However, the absence of common security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a gap that could expose the site to clickjacking or MIME sniffing attacks. No incident response or security contact information is publicly available, which limits transparency in security management. The site does not display a cookie consent banner despite using tracking technologies, which may raise compliance concerns under privacy regulations. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Add a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy laws and inform users about tracking.
  3. Publish clear security and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to enhance legitimacy and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Open The Books
Description
Open The Books provides detailed data on federal, state, and local government spending, offering access to nearly 10 billion public expenditures. The organization focuses on transparency and accountability in government spending.
Key services
Public expenditure database, Government salary and pension data, Investigative journalism and reports, Interactive maps and search tools
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, AngularJS, Google Analytics, Slick Carousel, Magnific Popup, jQuery UI, Modernizr
Frameworks
AngularJS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of request verification tokens in AJAX calls

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website provides extensive government spending data and investigative journalism.
  2. No WHOIS data available, possibly due to privacy or domain registration issues.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on main pages.
  4. Privacy and terms pages are present and linked in footer.
  5. No cookie consent banner detected despite use of tracking scripts.
  6. Modern web technologies and frameworks used.
  7. No security headers detected in provided data; recommend adding.
  8. No signs of adult or unsafe content.
  9. Strong media presence and trust signals.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a custom CMS platform using AngularJS and jQuery, supplemented by UI libraries such as jQuery UI and Slick Carousel for interactive elements. Google Fonts and Google Analytics are integrated for typography and analytics respectively. The site is mobile responsive with good accessibility features including ARIA roles and keyboard navigation instructions. Performance appears moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. The use of .axd resources indicates ASP.NET backend technology. There is an opportunity to improve technical SEO by adding structured data and enhancing meta tags. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a robust user experience but could benefit from modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with openthebooks.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review openthebooks.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.