Skip to main content

Security report for openpack.eu

Open Pack · Manufacturing · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Open Pack is a Latvia-based manufacturing company specializing in the production of cardboard packaging and point of sales (POS) materials. The company offers a broad range of packaging solutions including rigid cardboard, corrugated cardboard, and individual custom solutions, targeting businesses that require specialized packaging and POS materials. Their market position is that of an established small manufacturer with a focus on combining production expertise with sales specialization to deliver tailored solutions. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Google Analytics for tracking, Google reCAPTCHA v3 for form security, and a responsive design framework that ensures good mobile optimization. The site is hosted under a reputable registrar, GoDaddy.com, LLC, and uses HTTPS to secure communications. However, there is room for improvement in accessibility and security headers implementation. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates basic best practices such as HTTPS and CSRF protection on forms, but lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, security headers, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The absence of these elements suggests a moderate security posture with opportunities to enhance compliance and user trust. Overall, the website is professional and functional with clear contact information and social media presence, but would benefit from improved privacy compliance and enhanced security measures to strengthen its trustworthiness and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching openpack.eu

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Open Pack operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on packaging and POS material production. Their business model revolves around manufacturing and direct sales, targeting companies needing customized packaging solutions. The company leverages a combination of production and sales expertise to differentiate itself. While the website does not disclose financial or growth data, the presence of a named project manager and active social media accounts indicates an organized business structure. The lack of privacy and cookie policies may reflect a smaller scale operation or limited regulatory focus. Partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the data, suggesting a standalone business entity.

Security posture

The security maturity level of Open Pack's website is moderate. The use of HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA v3 on the contact form are positive indicators. The presence of CSRF tokens in forms further enhances security. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a notable gap. No evidence of vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies is found, which could impact the company's readiness to handle security incidents. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which may expose the company to regulatory risks under GDPR. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but requires enhancements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Improve accessibility features to ensure compliance with accessibility standards and enhance user experience.
  5. Regularly review and update security practices, including monitoring for vulnerable libraries and ensuring secure data handling.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Open Pack
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Open Pack
Description
We are a product packaging and POS material production company that combines production and sales specialists to help you find the best solution for your project. We produce a wide range of products including cardboard, corrugated cardboard, rigid cardboard (boxboard), paper, cloth, plastic, and other materials.
Key services
Rigid Cardboard Packaging, Corrugated Cardboard Packaging, Cardboard Packaging, Point of Sales Material, Individual Solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Slick Slider, Google Fonts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 on contact form
  • CSRF token present in contact form

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and mobile optimization.
  2. Contact information is prominently displayed with named project manager and direct contact details.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the main page.
  4. Use of Google Analytics and reCAPTCHA indicates basic security and analytics practices.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  6. No security headers detected in the provided data; potential area for improvement.
  7. WHOIS data shows domain registered via GoDaddy.com, LLC with no privacy protection.
  8. Social media presence on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Pinterest supports business credibility.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with Google Fonts, Slick Slider for interactive elements, and Google Analytics for tracking. The presence of Google reCAPTCHA v3 indicates attention to bot mitigation on forms. The site is hosted with a reputable registrar and uses HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. Performance appears moderate with responsive design and mobile optimization. However, the lack of detected CMS suggests a custom or proprietary platform, which may require dedicated maintenance. The absence of security headers and limited accessibility features indicate areas for technical improvement. Overall, the infrastructure supports the business needs but could benefit from modernization in security and compliance aspects.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with openpack.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review openpack.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.