Skip to main content

Security report for openet.com

Openet · Telecommunications · Ireland

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching openet.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
74
Security headers
35
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Amdocs operates in the technology and telecommunications sectors, providing essential monetization and digital transformation solutions for 5G and related domains such as IoT, media, gaming, and enterprise services. Their business model is B2B, focusing on software and services that enable telecom operators and enterprises to innovate and secure revenue streams in evolving markets. The company targets large enterprises and telecom operators globally, leveraging partnerships and a comprehensive service portfolio. The website reflects a mature marketing ecosystem with integrated analytics and consent management, supporting data-driven growth and customer engagement. While the domain registration details are not publicly available, the brand's global recognition and consistent digital presence affirm its market leadership. The absence of visible subsidiaries or partner domains on the site suggests a centralized brand strategy. The company’s content and digital assets indicate a focus on innovation, customer experience, and securing a competitive edge in the 5G monetization landscape.

Security posture

The website exhibits a strong security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented, including HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, Content-Security-Policy, and Referrer-Policy. The presence of a cookie consent mechanism via OneTrust demonstrates compliance with privacy regulations such as GDPR. No exposed sensitive information or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the site lacks publicly available security policies, incident response procedures, and vulnerability disclosure information, which are important for transparency and trust in enterprise environments. The absence of a security.txt file or dedicated security contact channels limits the ability for external security researchers to report issues responsibly. Overall, the site is secure from a technical standpoint but would benefit from enhanced security governance disclosures and incident management transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan accessible from the website footer or dedicated security page.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  3. Provide direct security contact information such as security@amdocs.com or abuse@amdocs.com to improve communication channels.
  4. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and marketing tools to mitigate supply chain risks and vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance disclosures by detailing data retention policies and user rights in accessible documentation.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Amdocs Limited
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Amdocs
Description
Amdocs empowers businesses to seize emerging revenue opportunities with 5G monetization use cases. Drive innovation and secure your position in the value chain.
Key services
5G monetization solutions, Digital transformation, Revenue management
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Marketo Munchkin, Trendemon, AddToAny sharing, Google Fonts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Marketo Munchkin, Google Tag Manager, Trendemon
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Marketo Munchkin, Trendemon
Marketing tools
Marketo, OneTrust, Trendemon
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong privacy and cookie compliance with OneTrust integration.
  3. Multiple marketing and analytics tools are in use.
  4. No explicit security policy or incident response info published.
  5. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is uncommon for enterprise domains.
  6. No suspicious or malicious indicators found in content or scripts.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with openet.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review openet.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.