OpenCage GmbH · Technology · Germany
Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.
OpenCage GmbH operates a specialized geocoding and geosearch API service that leverages open data sources such as OpenStreetMap to provide worldwide location data conversion. Established in 2013 and headquartered in Berlin, Germany, the company targets developers and enterprises seeking affordable, reliable, and open alternatives to proprietary geocoding services. Their business model includes subscription and pay-as-you-go pricing with a generous free trial, supported by extensive SDKs and tutorials for over 30 programming languages. The website reflects a mature market position with strong trust signals including customer testimonials, corporate memberships, and GDPR compliance. Technically, the website is well-constructed using modern web technologies including Bootstrap and Font Awesome, hosted on Cloudflare infrastructure ensuring fast performance and robust availability. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with comprehensive SEO and metadata implementation. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced, domain transfer protection, and a dedicated security policy page, although DNSSEC is not enabled and some security headers are not explicitly visible. Privacy compliance is evident with a detailed GDPR policy, but no explicit cookie consent mechanism was detected. Overall, OpenCage demonstrates a high level of digital maturity and business credibility. The security posture is solid with room for minor improvements in DNS security and vulnerability disclosure transparency. The website content is professional, safe, and highly relevant to its target audience. No blocking or WAF challenges were detected, allowing full content analysis. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, publishing a security.txt file for vulnerability reporting, implementing a cookie consent mechanism if cookies are used, and enhancing security headers to further harden the site against common web threats.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention opencagedata.com, from OffSeq Breach.
4 subdomains affected
See the 10 newest leaked credentials
A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for opencagedata.com.
Select it in the checkout above.
Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with opencagedata.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review opencagedata.com.