Skip to main content

Security report for open-cosmos.com

Open Cosmos Ltd. · Technology · United Kingdom

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Open Cosmos Ltd. is a technology company specializing in the design, build, and operation of space missions, providing accessible satellite data and insights globally. The company offers end-to-end satellite mission services including assembly, launch, in-orbit operations, and data delivery. Their innovative OpenConstellation platform enables shared satellite infrastructure to address global challenges such as climate change and natural resource management. With multiple European offices and a strong social media presence, Open Cosmos positions itself as a key player in the satellite data and earth observation market. Technically, the website is built on modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, Google Fonts, and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is well-optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility, featuring a professional design and clear navigation. Cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policies indicate good privacy compliance. However, explicit security headers and incident response information are absent, representing areas for improvement. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities or sensitive data exposure. The lack of WHOIS transparency slightly reduces trust but the overall business credibility remains high due to consistent branding, multiple physical addresses, and professional content. The site uses Google Analytics for moderate user tracking with good privacy compliance. Overall, Open Cosmos demonstrates a mature digital presence with strong business credibility and technical implementation. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, and improving WHOIS transparency to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching open-cosmos.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
87
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention open-cosmos.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
81
Employees
0
Customers
81
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
2%

4 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for open-cosmos.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Open Cosmos operates in the space technology sector with a focus on satellite missions and earth observation data services. Their business model centers on providing end-to-end satellite mission solutions and a shared satellite constellation platform, targeting organizations needing high-quality satellite data. The company leverages partnerships and subsidiaries across Europe to expand its footprint. Their competitive advantage lies in simplifying access to space and satellite data, addressing critical global challenges. Revenue streams likely include satellite mission contracts, data platform subscriptions, and related services. Growth indicators include recent news on acquisitions and defense contracts. The partnership ecosystem includes creative agencies and theme providers for digital presence. Overall, Open Cosmos maintains a strong market position with a clear focus on innovation and sustainability.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, reflecting awareness of privacy regulations like GDPR. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security or incident response policies indicate gaps in security best practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The company does not publicly disclose a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file, which could improve transparency and incident handling. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced by formalizing security policies and improving header configurations to mitigate potential risks.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response contact information on the website to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Increase WHOIS transparency by ensuring accurate and complete domain registration data is publicly available to strengthen trust.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and analytics tools to minimize privacy risks and ensure compliance with evolving data protection regulations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Open Cosmos Ltd.
Registration number
09704443
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Open Cosmos Ltd.
Description
Open Cosmos design, build and operate space missions, providing straightforward access to high quality satellite data and insights on a global scale.
Key services
Satellite missions, OpenConstellation shared satellite infrastructure, Data & Services platform for satellite imagery and insights
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Fonts, Webflow CMS, jQuery 3.5.1, Google Tag Manager, Finsweet Cookie Consent
Platforms
Webflow
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Marketing tools
Finsweet Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  3. WHOIS data unavailable or privacy protected, limiting domain registration transparency.
  4. Strong presence on social media and multiple European offices.
  5. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and GDPR compliant.
  6. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts published.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging modern web fonts and JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Google Tag Manager for analytics. Performance is optimized with fast loading times and excellent mobile responsiveness. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility features are present but could be further enhanced. The technical infrastructure is modern and well-maintained, with no visible technical debt or deprecated technologies. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified but the use of CDN.prod.website-files.com suggests a reliable content delivery network. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and user-friendly digital experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with open-cosmos.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review open-cosmos.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.