Skip to main content

Security report for opcinailidza.ba

Općina Ilidža · Government · Bosnia and Herzegovina

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Općina Ilidža operates as the official municipal government portal for the Ilidža municipality in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The website provides residents and stakeholders with access to public announcements, e-forms, contact information, and details about local governance and services. It serves as a key communication channel between the local government and the community, emphasizing transparency and accessibility. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Elementor page builder, leveraging common web technologies such as jQuery and Google Fonts. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness, with good SEO practices and basic accessibility features. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking, although privacy disclosures are lacking. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and includes several important security headers, indicating a good baseline security posture. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of visible privacy and cookie policies, as well as incident response contacts, suggests areas for compliance and security improvement. Overall, the website is a professional and trustworthy government resource with solid technical foundations. Strategic enhancements in privacy compliance and security transparency would further strengthen its risk profile and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching opcinailidza.ba

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention opcinailidza.ba, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
12
Employees
0
Customers
4
Third parties
8
Weak passwords
0%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for opcinailidza.ba.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions Općina Ilidža as a local government entity focused on serving its community through digital means. Its business model is centered on public service and information dissemination rather than commercial activities. The portal supports transparency by publishing official documents, public procurement information, and council activities. The target audience includes local residents, businesses, and government officials. The site’s integration with official social media channels and structured data markup enhances its credibility and outreach. While no direct revenue streams are evident, the platform supports governance and civic engagement, which are critical for municipal operations. The lack of privacy and security policy disclosures may impact user confidence and compliance with regional regulations such as GDPR.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, presence of key security headers (HSTS, CSP, X-Frame-Options, etc.), and no visible exposure of sensitive information. The use of reputable third-party libraries and frameworks reduces risk, although continuous monitoring of dependencies is recommended. The absence of a published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy limits transparency and preparedness for security events. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing policies and consent mechanisms, which could expose the municipality to regulatory risks. Overall, the site is secure for general public use but would benefit from formalizing security governance and privacy practices.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and implement a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  2. Create and publicize an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve security transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards and improve usability for all users.
  5. Consider implementing security awareness and training for site administrators to maintain a strong security culture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Općina Ilidža
Description
Zvanični web portal Općine Ilidža, pruža informacije o lokalnoj upravi, aktuelnostima, javnim nabavkama, općinskim vijećima i kontaktima.
Key services
Public announcements, E-forms, Contact information, Information on municipal services and governance
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Elementor, WordPress, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Official municipal government website for Općina Ilidža
  2. Content is comprehensive for local government services and announcements
  3. No privacy or cookie policies visibly present
  4. Uses WordPress with Elementor page builder
  5. Includes social media links to official government pages
  6. No signs of malicious or suspicious content
  7. Good security headers and HTTPS usage
  8. Moderate use of analytics and tracking scripts without explicit privacy disclosures
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform with the Elementor page builder, utilizing jQuery and Google Fonts for frontend functionality and styling. Google Tag Manager is integrated for analytics and tracking purposes. The site employs modern web standards including responsive design and SEO-friendly metadata. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading times and resource management. Security headers are properly configured, and HTTPS is enforced, indicating good infrastructure hygiene. However, the lack of visible privacy and cookie management tools suggests incomplete compliance with modern web standards. Technical debt appears low, but ongoing maintenance and modernization efforts are advisable to sustain performance and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with opcinailidza.ba. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review opcinailidza.ba.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.