Skip to main content

Security report for oparany.cz

Obec Opařany · Government · Czech Republic

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.ou.oparany.cz serves as the official online presence for the municipality of Opařany in the Czech Republic. It provides residents and visitors with essential information about the local government, services, cultural events, and contact details. The site is positioned as a small government entity portal focused on transparency and community engagement. Technically, the site is built on the WRS content management system and utilizes several JavaScript libraries including jQuery, Lightslider, and Bootstrap, although some libraries are outdated which may pose security risks. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and accessibility but lacks advanced SEO and modern performance enhancements. Security posture is basic; HTTPS is used, and CSRF tokens are present in forms, but no security headers were detected and outdated libraries increase vulnerability risk. Privacy and cookie policies are present but basic, with no explicit incident response or security policy information. Contact information is comprehensive and clearly presented, enhancing business credibility. WHOIS data is unavailable, which reduces trustworthiness from a domain registration perspective. Overall, the site is functional and safe for general audiences but would benefit from technical and security improvements to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching oparany.cz

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The municipality of Opařany operates this website as a local government service portal, targeting residents and visitors seeking official information and services. The business model is public sector focused, providing transparency and community resources without commercial intent. The site’s market position is that of a small municipal government entity with limited digital maturity. Revenue streams are not applicable as it is a government site. The partnership ecosystem includes W Partner s.r.o., the CMS provider, and local government partners. Growth indicators are limited due to the nature of the entity. The site’s operations emphasize information dissemination, public notices, and community engagement. The lack of advanced analytics or marketing tools reflects a focus on public service rather than commercial growth.

Security posture

The current security maturity level of the website is basic. The use of HTTPS and CSRF tokens in forms are positive indicators. However, the presence of outdated JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 1.11.3 introduces known vulnerabilities that could be exploited. The absence of security headers like Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options weakens the site’s defense against common web attacks. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, indicating limited preparedness for security incidents. GDPR compliance is partially addressed through privacy and cookie policies, but more explicit data protection measures and transparency would improve compliance. Overall, the site’s security posture requires enhancements to meet modern standards and protect user data effectively.

Recommendations

  1. Update all JavaScript libraries and dependencies to their latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  3. Publish explicit security policies and incident response procedures to improve transparency and preparedness.
  4. Enhance privacy compliance by providing detailed cookie consent mechanisms and data retention policies.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing to identify and remediate vulnerabilities proactively.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Obec Opařany
VAT number
CZ00252638
Registration number
00252638
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Obec Opařany
Description
Oficiální webové stránky obce Opařany poskytující informace o obci, samosprávě, úřadu, službách, kultuře, sportu a spolcích.
Key services
Municipal news and updates, Contact information for municipal offices, Public notices and official documents, Local services information, Cultural and sports events information
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.11.3, Lightslider, Fancybox 2.1.5, Flexslider, Bootstrap 4.0.0-alpha.6, Google Fonts (Yanone Kaffeesatz, Poppins), jQuery UI 1.11.4
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • CSRF token present in search form

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an official municipal site for Opařany, Czech Republic.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable, indicating possible domain registration or WHOIS server issues.
  3. Site uses older JavaScript libraries with potential security risks.
  4. No visible security headers or explicit security policies found.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present but basic.
  6. No terms of service or incident response information found.
  7. Contact information is comprehensive and clearly presented.
  8. No advertising or tracking services detected.
  9. Site is accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
  10. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the WRS CMS platform and uses a combination of JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 1.11.3, Lightslider, Fancybox, Flexslider, and Bootstrap 4 alpha. The use of older versions of jQuery and Bootstrap indicates technical debt and potential security risks. The site loads external fonts from Google Fonts and scripts from CDNs. Performance is moderate with some mobile optimization but limited advanced responsive design features. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA landmarks and skip links but could be improved. SEO is basic with meta tags for description and keywords but lacks structured data like JSON-LD or Open Graph tags. The site does not appear to use modern frontend frameworks or advanced caching mechanisms. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but dated, with opportunities for modernization and performance improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with oparany.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review oparany.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.