Skip to main content

Security report for onlyhomemadeanal.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website onlyhomemadeanal.com operates as an adult content platform specializing in homemade amateur anal porn videos. It targets adult audiences seeking niche content in this category. The business model relies primarily on advertising revenue and affiliate partnerships with other adult sites. The site offers categorized video content with search functionality but lacks comprehensive corporate or business identity information. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies including Google Analytics for tracking and multiple ad networks for monetization. The site is accessible without WAF or security challenges, but lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and transparency. Overall, the site presents basic content quality and technical implementation but falls short in privacy and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching onlyhomemadeanal.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site occupies a niche segment within the adult entertainment industry, focusing on homemade amateur anal content. It leverages affiliate marketing and advertising networks extensively, linking to numerous partner adult domains. The lack of identifiable business or company information suggests a small or informal operation. The target customers are adult viewers interested in free amateur anal videos. The site’s growth potential depends on traffic volume and affiliate conversions. The absence of privacy policies and contact details limits trust and regulatory compliance. The partnership ecosystem is broad but primarily adult content focused. Strategic observations include the need for improved transparency, privacy compliance, and security posture to enhance credibility and user trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a low to moderate security maturity level. While HTTPS is used, no explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are detected. There is no evidence of a formal security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure mechanism. The site uses extensive third-party advertising and tracking scripts, increasing privacy risks. No contact channels for security incidents or abuse are provided. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and similar regulations. The business impact of these gaps includes potential legal exposure, user trust erosion, and increased risk of exploitation. Enhancing security controls and compliance measures is critical for risk mitigation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear user consent mechanisms.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and security incident response contacts.
  4. Improve transparency by providing verified WHOIS registration data or business identity information.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and ensure compliance with relevant data protection regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Only homemade anal porn videos, amateur wife first time anal sex, surprise unexpected anal sex, amateur anal, real ass fuck and screaming anal sex! First butt fuck real amateur, girlfriend and mature anal, fingering and first anal fisting!
Key services
Streaming homemade amateur anal porn videos, Video categorization by latest, top rated, most popular, Affiliate linking to partner adult sites
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, jQuery, exoNativeWidget Ads, AdProvider Ads, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
45/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL https://)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
exoNativeWidget, AdProvider, TrafficHunt
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website hosts adult content focused on homemade amateur anal videos.
  2. No WHOIS registration data available, indicating possible privacy protection or unregistered domain.
  3. No privacy or cookie policy found; only terms of service and contact form present.
  4. Heavy use of third-party advertising and tracking scripts.
  5. No explicit security headers or advanced security policies detected.
  6. Website design and content quality are basic with moderate branding consistency.
  7. Navigation and SEO are basic but functional.
  8. No company contact emails or phone numbers found.
  9. Extensive external linking to adult partner sites.
  10. No social media or corporate business information present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard HTML5 structure with JavaScript for analytics and advertising integration. Google Analytics is implemented for user tracking, and multiple ad networks serve native and popunder ads. The site lacks a detected CMS, suggesting a custom or static site build. Performance is moderate with some optimization potential. Mobile responsiveness is basic but functional. SEO is supported by meta tags and canonical links but could be improved. Accessibility features are minimal. The technical debt includes missing security headers and lack of privacy compliance tools. Modernization opportunities include adopting a CMS for easier content management, enhancing mobile UX, and integrating privacy management frameworks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with onlyhomemadeanal.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review onlyhomemadeanal.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.