Skip to main content

Security report for onlinedatingprotector.com

VENNTRO MEDIA GROUP LTD · Other · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Online Dating Protector is a UK-based service operated by VENNTRO MEDIA GROUP LTD focused on enhancing safety in online dating environments. The website promotes services such as 24/7 moderation, anti-scam software, and genuine member verification to protect users from fraudulent profiles and scams. It targets online dating users seeking safer interactions and provides links to various dating platforms catering to different demographics. Technically, the website is built with basic HTML and CSS, utilizing Google Fonts for typography. The site lacks modern frameworks or CMS indications and shows basic mobile optimization and accessibility. No advanced analytics or advertising technologies are detected, indicating a minimalistic technical footprint. From a security perspective, the site lacks HTTPS enforcement and security headers, which significantly lowers its security posture. The absence of privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies further reduces compliance with data protection regulations. The WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, raising concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness. No contact information or incident response details are provided, limiting transparency. Overall, the website presents a moderate risk profile with good content quality but critical gaps in security, privacy compliance, and domain legitimacy. Strategic improvements in SSL implementation, policy publication, and domain registration transparency are recommended to enhance trust and security.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching onlinedatingprotector.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the niche online dating safety sector, providing moderation and anti-scam services to improve user trust on dating platforms. Its competitive advantage lies in a UK-based expert team and proprietary anti-scam software. The business model appears service-oriented, likely monetized through partnerships or service contracts with dating sites. The target customers are online dating users concerned about safety and scam prevention. The company is small-sized and part of VENNTRO MEDIA GROUP LTD, indicating a focused operational scope. The external links to various dating sites suggest a broad partnership ecosystem. However, the lack of public contact and compliance documentation may hinder growth and trust. Strategically, the company should enhance transparency, improve compliance with GDPR and other regulations, and strengthen its digital presence to compete effectively in the online dating safety market.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is low due to the absence of HTTPS, security headers, and published privacy or cookie policies. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are evident. The missing WHOIS data further undermines trust and raises potential risks of domain hijacking or impersonation. The lack of contact information and security policies indicates limited readiness for incident handling or regulatory compliance. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. To improve, the organization should implement SSL/TLS, add security headers, publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, and establish clear incident response contacts. These steps will reduce business risk and improve user confidence.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure user connections and improve trust.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  3. Add clear contact information including support and incident response channels.
  4. Obtain and maintain proper domain registration with accurate WHOIS data to enhance legitimacy.
  5. Incorporate security headers and conduct regular security audits to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
VENNTRO MEDIA GROUP LTD
Description
Online Dating Protector is a service focused on online dating safety, providing 24/7 moderation, anti-scam software, and a highly trained UK-based team to ensure genuine members and report suspicious profiles.
Key services
24/7 moderation, Anti-scam software, Profile reporting, Safety tips and resources
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, Google Fonts (Lato)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses provided.
  4. No security headers or HTTPS status information available from provided data.
  5. WHOIS data is missing, indicating possible domain registration issues.
  6. Website focuses on online dating safety with UK-based team and anti-scam software.
  7. External links mostly point to various dating-related domains.
  8. No analytics or advertising scripts detected in the HTML content.
  9. Site uses Google Fonts for typography.
  10. No forms or data collection fields present in the HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple technical stack with static HTML and CSS, supplemented by Google Fonts. There is no evidence of a CMS or advanced frameworks. The site lacks modern performance optimizations and accessibility features, which could impact user experience on mobile devices and for users with disabilities. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal data collection. The absence of HTTPS is a critical technical deficiency. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not available. Overall, the technical implementation is basic and would benefit from modernization, improved security configurations, and enhanced accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with onlinedatingprotector.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review onlinedatingprotector.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.