Skip to main content

Security report for onlinecomputing.co.uk

Tela · Technology · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tela is a UK-based business communications and IT services provider with over 35 years of experience. The company offers a comprehensive range of services including mobile business solutions, unified communications, IT support, connectivity, and Internet of Things technologies. Tela positions itself as a trusted partner for UK businesses, emphasizing strong relationships, quality technology partnerships, and tailored communication solutions. The website reflects a mature market presence with clear branding, professional content, and multiple trust signals such as certifications and awards. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern front-end technologies and integrates analytics and marketing tools responsibly. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, reCAPTCHA, and cookie consent mechanisms, though some security headers could be improved. Overall, Tela demonstrates a solid digital maturity and business credibility suitable for its target audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching onlinecomputing.co.uk

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention onlinecomputing.co.uk, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for onlinecomputing.co.uk right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Tela operates in the telecommunications and technology sectors, targeting medium-sized UK businesses requiring integrated communication and IT solutions. Its business model is B2B, leveraging partnerships with major technology providers like Vodafone, Samsung, and RingCentral. The company maintains a strong partnership ecosystem and showcases customer success stories and certifications to reinforce market trust. Tela's growth is supported by a diversified service portfolio and a focus on future-proof connectivity and cybersecurity compliance. The presence of a customer portal and detailed resource center indicates a commitment to customer engagement and support.

Security posture

Tela's website employs HTTPS with a good SSL configuration, uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, and provides cookie consent to comply with privacy regulations. The site does not expose sensitive data and integrates mobile device management and security solutions as part of its service offerings. However, explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not found, and some recommended security headers are missing. The overall security maturity is good, but there is room for improvement in transparency and technical security controls to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  2. Add and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy to strengthen web security.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Ensure all forms have robust server-side validation and secure data handling practices.
  5. Enhance data retention and privacy policy details to clearly communicate user data handling and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
Tela
Registration number
7974624
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tela
Description
Tela Technology: 35 years of trusted UK business communications. Mobile, fixed-line, internet, Unified Communications and Managed IT Support. Contact us today!
Key services
Business Mobile Solutions, Unified Communications, IT Services, Connectivity, Internet of Things, Managed IT Support, Cyber Essentials Certification
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Tiny Slider, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, LazyLoad Images, YouTube API, SVG graphics
Frameworks
Bootstrap (CSS grid and flexbox classes)
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration
  • Cookie consent banner
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security & mobile device management solutions (Samsung Knox, SOTI, Vodafone Secure Device Manager)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
LinkedIn Ads
Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag, Inventive52 Intuitive tracking
Marketing tools
CookieYes Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Strong focus on business communications and IT services
  3. Clear presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanism
  4. Use of modern web technologies and security best practices
  5. No signs of blocking or WAF interference
  6. Active use of analytics and marketing tools with transparency
  7. Multiple trust indicators including certifications, awards, and testimonials
  8. Contact information is available but no explicit security policy or incident response contact found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern responsive design using Bootstrap CSS framework. It integrates JavaScript libraries for sliders, lazy loading images, and YouTube video embedding. Google Tag Manager and analytics services are used for tracking and marketing. The site performs moderately well with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. There is no evidence of technical debt or deprecated technologies. Hosting details are not explicit, but the site uses multiple external domains for analytics and marketing. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly experience with opportunities to enhance security headers and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with onlinecomputing.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review onlinecomputing.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.