Skip to main content

Security report for online.lv

Tet · Telecommunications · Latvia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website online.lv serves as a webmail login portal for Tet, a telecommunications company based in Latvia. The site is focused on providing email access to its customers and does not contain broader corporate information or marketing content. The technical infrastructure relies on ExtJS and Axigen webmail software, indicating a mature but basic webmail platform. The site is functional with moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. Security features include CAPTCHA and JavaScript checks for cookies and enabled scripts, but lack modern HTTP security headers and privacy policies. No contact or compliance information is present, limiting transparency and user trust. Overall, the site is secure enough for its purpose but could benefit from enhanced security headers, privacy compliance, and contact information to improve user confidence and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of online.lv. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching online.lv

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Tet is an established telecommunications provider in Latvia, offering email and other communication services. The online.lv domain is dedicated to webmail access, targeting existing customers rather than new business acquisition. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on reliable email hosting. The lack of marketing or business information on this site suggests it is a utility portal rather than a corporate site. The company likely operates a broader ecosystem under the Tet brand. No partnerships or subsidiaries are indicated on this page. The site’s minimal content and absence of contact details limit direct customer engagement through this portal.

Security posture

The security posture of the online.lv webmail portal is moderate. The presence of CAPTCHA and client-side checks for cookies and JavaScript indicate basic protections against automated abuse and user environment validation. However, the absence of HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces the defense-in-depth level. No vulnerability disclosure or security policy information is provided, which may hinder incident response and transparency. The login form is protected by CAPTCHA but lacks visible multi-factor authentication options. Overall, the site is functional and reasonably secure for webmail access but could improve by adopting modern security best practices and compliance disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Publish privacy and cookie policies with explicit GDPR compliance statements and consent mechanisms.
  3. Add contact information and security policy pages to improve transparency and user trust.
  4. Introduce a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure program to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility features to improve user experience across devices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tet
Description
Tet is a telecommunications company providing email services among other offerings. The website is primarily a webmail login portal for Tet's email customers.
Key services
Email hosting and webmail access
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, ExtJS, Axigen Webmail
Frameworks
ExtJS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • CAPTCHA on login
  • JavaScript checks for cookies and JS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a webmail login portal for Tet, a Latvian telecommunications company.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the login page.
  3. No contact information or security policies are present on the page.
  4. Uses ExtJS framework and Axigen webmail software.
  5. No external analytics or advertising scripts detected.
  6. Security measures include CAPTCHA and JavaScript checks for cookies and JS enabled.
  7. No security headers or meta tags detected in the provided HTML.
  8. No social media links or contact emails found on the login page.
  9. Content is minimal and focused solely on login functionality.
  10. No WAF or blocking detected; content is fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses ExtJS framework and Axigen webmail software, indicating a specialized webmail platform. The HTML is valid but lacks meta tags for SEO and accessibility. Performance appears moderate with some asynchronous JavaScript loading. No CMS or hosting provider information is evident. The site lacks modern SEO and accessibility features, and no analytics or tracking scripts are present. The login form is well-structured with client-side validation and CAPTCHA integration. Technical debt is low but modernization opportunities exist in security headers, privacy compliance, and mobile responsiveness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 69/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with online.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review online.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.