Skip to main content

Security report for onixtools.de

Cover Softwarelösungen GmbH & Co. KG · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Cover Softwarelösungen GmbH & Co. KG is a specialized software provider focused on metadata exchange and management solutions for the publishing industry, particularly leveraging ONIX standards. Their key products include ONIX Export Engine and ONIX Import Engine, complemented by consulting and project management services tailored for publishers and book trade professionals. The company positions itself as an experienced niche player with over 25 years in the market, emphasizing quality and integration with various publishing systems. Technically, the website is built on a mature ASP.NET Web Forms platform using Telerik UI components, indicating a stable but somewhat traditional technology stack. The site is moderately optimized for performance and basic mobile responsiveness, with good SEO practices but limited accessibility features. No modern CMS or advanced analytics/tracking tools are detected, suggesting a focus on content delivery over marketing. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and does not expose sensitive data, but lacks visible security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. There is no published security policy or incident response information, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. The WHOIS data is minimal but consistent with a legitimate small business domain, though the name servers are generic. Overall, the website is professional, content-rich, and trustworthy for its target audience, but could benefit from enhanced privacy compliance, security best practices, and improved mobile and accessibility features to strengthen its digital maturity and risk posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching onixtools.de

This scan found 31 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology and media sectors, providing specialized software solutions for metadata management in publishing. Its business model combines product sales with consulting services, targeting publishers and book trade entities. The long-standing market presence and integration with multiple ERP and CMS systems provide competitive advantages. The partnership with Covernet.de suggests a broader ecosystem for client engagement and support. Growth indicators include strategic product handover and continued development under Cover Softwarelösungen GmbH & Co. KG. Revenue streams likely derive from software licenses, consulting fees, and support contracts. The company maintains a focused niche with a professional reputation but limited public marketing or social media presence.

Security posture

The current security maturity is moderate. The website enforces HTTPS but lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No security or incident response policies are published, and no dedicated security contact channels are provided. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms may pose GDPR compliance risks. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The security score reflects these strengths and gaps. Enhancing security headers, publishing policies, and implementing consent mechanisms would improve compliance and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and explicit cookie policy to comply with GDPR requirements.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Improve mobile responsiveness and accessibility to enhance user experience and compliance.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and frameworks to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Cover Softwarelösungen GmbH & Co. KG
Description
Cover Softwarelösungen GmbH & Co. KG in Buchenbach is specialized in software for metadata exchange and metadata management in the publishing industry. They offer ONIX Export Engine 3.0 and ONIX Import Engine products and provide consulting, metadata quality assessment, project management, and IT services for publishers and book trade.
Key services
ONIX Export Engine, ONIX Import Engine, Consulting for publishers and book trade, Metadata quality assessment, Project management, IT consulting in publishing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
ASP.NET Web Forms, Telerik UI components, JavaScript
Frameworks
ASP.NET, Telerik.Web.UI
Platforms
Windows Server (implied by ASP.NET)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie banner found, though privacy policy is linked externally.
  3. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly provided on the site.
  4. Contact email is provided in meta tags and contact page is external.
  5. Website uses ASP.NET with Telerik UI components indicating a mature but traditional tech stack.
  6. No social media links detected in the HTML content.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  8. No security headers visible in the HTML content; server headers unknown.
  9. Content is focused on ONIX metadata management software for publishing industry.
  10. No terms of service or security policy pages found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses ASP.NET Web Forms with Telerik UI components, indicating a mature but somewhat legacy technology stack. The site is hosted on servers using generic name servers (ns.frei.net), with no CMS detected. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility. SEO is well addressed with meta tags and structured navigation. The lack of modern JavaScript frameworks or analytics tools suggests limited digital marketing integration. Technical risks include potential outdated components and missing security headers. Opportunities exist to modernize the stack, improve mobile and accessibility features, and enhance security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with onixtools.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review onixtools.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.