Skip to main content

Security report for onisep.fr

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.onisep.fr is currently inaccessible due to a Cloudflare Turnstile security verification challenge, preventing access to its actual content. ONISEP is known as a French governmental educational portal, but the lack of accessible content limits detailed business and security analysis. The site uses Cloudflare for protection, indicating a focus on security, but no visible security headers or policies can be confirmed. The domain WHOIS data is not publicly available, consistent with privacy protection often used by government entities. Overall, the site appears legitimate but is currently blocked for analysis.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching onisep.fr

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention onisep.fr, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2,704
Employees
27
Customers
2,536
Third parties
141
Weak passwords
17%

Latest record dated 2026-05-24 · 57 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for onisep.fr.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –biblionisep.onisep.fr2026-05-24
  • –biblionisep.onisep.fr2026-05-16
  • –lekiosqueenligne.onisep.fr2026-05-13
  • –sep.onisep.fr2026-01-13
  • –sep.onisep.fr2025-11-16

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ONISEP is a French government-related educational service, likely providing information and resources about education and career guidance. The external links to official French education government domains support this. The business model is presumably public service with no commercial advertising or affiliate programs detected. The target audience is likely students, educators, and parents in France. Due to the blocked content, no further business intelligence such as revenue streams or partnerships can be assessed.

Security posture

The site employs Cloudflare Turnstile captcha as a security measure, indicating a proactive approach to mitigate automated attacks and abuse. However, due to the blocked content, no detailed security headers or SSL configuration could be analyzed. No incident response or security policy information is visible. The lack of visible privacy and cookie policies is a compliance gap. The security posture is moderate but cannot be fully assessed without access.

Recommendations

  1. Allow access past the Cloudflare security challenge for full content and security analysis.
  2. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies accessible from all pages.
  3. Implement and expose security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Provide visible contact information including security incident response contacts.
  5. Regularly audit WHOIS data and ensure domain registration details are consistent with organizational identity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Cloudflare detected. The website is currently presenting a Cloudflare security verification (Turnstile captcha) page blocking access to actual content. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare Turnstile, JavaScript, HTML5, CSS3

Analytics and tracking

Site quality

Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is blocked by Cloudflare Turnstile security challenge.
  2. No WHOIS data available from AFNIC public query, indicating privacy or restricted access.
  3. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies on the blocked page.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links found in the accessible content.
  5. External links point to official French government education domains.
  6. No forms or data collection fields visible on the blocked page.
  7. No analytics or advertising scripts detected in the accessible content.
  8. Website uses Cloudflare for security and likely hosting.
  9. Content safety is safe with no adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Cloudflare as a security and hosting provider, with JavaScript and CSS for frontend rendering. The presence of Cloudflare Turnstile indicates modern bot mitigation technology. No CMS or backend technologies are detectable from the blocked page. Performance and SEO cannot be evaluated due to lack of content. The site appears mobile responsive based on CSS classes but cannot be confirmed visually. Technical debt or modernization needs cannot be assessed without full access.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with onisep.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review onisep.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.