Skip to main content

Security report for onfa.org

Opera Nazionale per i Figli degli Aviatori · Government · Italy

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ONFA (Opera Nazionale per i Figli degli Aviatori) is an Italian non-profit organization dedicated to providing social assistance and support to the children of aviators. The website serves as an informational and community platform targeting families connected to the aviation sector in Italy. The organization operates with a focused mission in the government and non-profit sectors, maintaining a small organizational size and a niche market position. The website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme, with integration of Iubenda for cookie consent management, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity and compliance with privacy regulations such as GDPR. Technically, the website is hosted on a provider using Host Anycast DNS servers, secured with HTTPS, and employs modern web fonts and cookie consent scripts. Performance and mobile optimization are rated as moderate to good, with basic accessibility features. SEO practices appear adequate with proper meta tags and structured data. Security posture is decent with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections enabled, but could be improved by enabling DNSSEC and adding more comprehensive security headers and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is solid for a small non-profit, with no critical vulnerabilities detected. Privacy compliance is strong, supported by a comprehensive privacy and cookie policy with explicit consent mechanisms. However, the absence of terms of service, security policy, and incident response contact details indicates areas for improvement. The website content is safe and appropriate for a general audience, with no adult or questionable content. Strategically, ONFA should focus on enhancing security headers, publishing a security.txt file, and providing clearer contact information to improve trust and compliance. These steps will strengthen their security culture and better protect their community members.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MSSQL

      Port 1433 (MSSQL) is publicly accessible - MSSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MSSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: Oracle

      Port 1521 (Oracle) is publicly accessible - Oracle - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to Oracle using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching onfa.org

This scan found 30 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
32
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
68
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ONFA operates in a specialized niche serving the families of aviators in Italy, positioning itself as a trusted non-profit entity within the aviation community. Its business model revolves around social assistance and welfare services, likely funded through donations or government support. The organization targets a specific demographic, which limits its market size but enhances its relevance and impact. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, supporting its credibility. Partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the website or WHOIS data, indicating a standalone operation. The use of privacy protection in domain registration is appropriate for a non-profit to safeguard personal data. The organization could benefit from expanding its digital presence and transparency to attract more support and engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and domain status protections in place. The use of Iubenda for cookie consent shows awareness of privacy compliance. However, the lack of DNSSEC, security.txt, and advanced security headers such as Content Security Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The absence of explicit incident response contacts or security policies may hinder rapid response to potential threats. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the organization's size and sector but should be enhanced to meet higher standards and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement a Content Security Policy (CSP) header to mitigate cross-site scripting and other code injection attacks.
  3. Publish a security.txt file to provide clear vulnerability disclosure and incident response contacts.
  4. Add additional security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the website against common attacks.
  5. Provide explicit contact information for security incidents and data protection officer details to enhance transparency and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Opera Nazionale per i Figli degli Aviatori
Description
ONFA is a non-profit organization dedicated to supporting the children of aviators. It provides social assistance and support services to families of aviators, focusing on welfare and community support.
Key services
Social assistance, Support for aviators' children, Community welfare programs
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, Google Fonts, Iubenda Cookie Consent
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited and clientUpdateProhibited domain status
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Iubenda Cookie Solution
Marketing tools
Iubenda Cookie Consent
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Content is in Italian and targeted at a specific non-profit community
  3. Uses WordPress CMS with Divi theme and Iubenda for cookie compliance
  4. No exposed sensitive data or obvious security issues found
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the main HTML content
  6. Cookie consent banner is implemented with detailed configuration
  7. No terms of service page detected
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Divi theme, a popular and flexible framework for content management. It leverages Google Fonts for typography and integrates Iubenda scripts for cookie consent and privacy management. Hosting is provided by a service using Host Anycast DNS servers, indicating a geographically distributed DNS infrastructure. Performance is moderate, with some optimizations possible in caching and resource loading. Mobile responsiveness is good, ensuring accessibility across devices. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured data, although accessibility features are basic and could be improved with ARIA roles and better semantic markup. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with onfa.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review onfa.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.