Skip to main content

Security report for onf-agirpourlaforet.fr

ONF-Agir pour la forêt · Government · France

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ONF-Agir pour la forêt is a French non-profit organization dedicated to raising funds to support projects of general interest in public forests managed by the Office National des Forêts (ONF) and its partners. The website presents a professional and well-structured platform aimed at individuals and enterprises interested in sustainable forest management and biodiversity preservation. The organization positions itself as a key player in environmental conservation within France, leveraging public engagement and corporate sponsorships to finance its initiatives. Technically, the website employs a modern technology stack including Vue.js, jQuery, GSAP, and integrates analytics tools such as Matomo and Google Tag Manager. It uses a proprietary or custom CMS platform and implements cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent tools, but lacks explicit security policies or incident response information. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The WHOIS data confirms the domain's legitimacy and consistency with the organization's profile. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professionally maintained, and compliant with privacy regulations, making it a reliable source for donors and partners interested in forest conservation efforts in France.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching onf-agirpourlaforet.fr

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the government and non-profit sectors, focusing on environmental conservation and sustainable forest management. Its business model revolves around fundraising and project financing, targeting both individual donors and corporate sponsors. The website highlights six main intervention domains, including biodiversity, risk prevention, public access, heritage preservation, and innovation. The presence of social media channels and newsletters indicates active engagement strategies. The domain age and WHOIS data align with the organization's founding date, supporting credibility. The lack of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a preference for controlled communication channels via forms and social media.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented. However, it lacks published security policies, incident response plans, and security.txt files, which are recommended best practices. No security headers were explicitly detected in the provided data, indicating room for improvement. The use of reputable analytics and consent tools shows awareness of privacy compliance. No vulnerabilities or suspicious domains were found. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-profit informational site but could be enhanced with formal security documentation and additional HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan on the website to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  2. Implement and configure HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve protection against common web attacks.
  3. Consider creating and publishing a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Enhance accessibility features beyond basic contrast options to improve inclusivity for users with disabilities.
  5. Provide clear and direct contact information such as official emails or phone numbers for business and security inquiries to improve trust and communication.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ONF-Agir pour la forêt
Description
ONF-Agir pour la forêt collecte des fonds pour financer des projets d’intérêt général réalisés dans les forêts publiques françaises par l’ONF et ses partenaires.
Key services
Fundraising, Project financing, Public awareness and engagement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.2.4, Vue.js, GSAP, Google Tag Manager, Matomo Analytics, TarteAuCitron (cookie consent)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data found

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and maintained by a French non-profit organization.
  2. Content is primarily in French with clear focus on forest conservation and fundraising.
  3. Social media presence is active and linked in footer and header.
  4. Cookie consent is implemented using TarteAuCitron.
  5. No signs of phishing, malware, or suspicious activity detected.
  6. No direct email addresses or phone numbers found in the visible content; contact is via contact form and social media.
  7. Accessibility is basic with some features like contrast change button.
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of modern JavaScript frameworks and libraries including Vue.js and jQuery, supported by GSAP for animations. Analytics are handled via Matomo and Google Tag Manager, indicating a focus on privacy-aware tracking. The CMS appears custom or proprietary (myams), which may require dedicated maintenance resources. Performance is moderate with responsive design for mobile devices. SEO is supported by comprehensive meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic but includes some features like contrast adjustment. Hosting details are not explicit but the domain registrar is NAMESHIELD, a reputable provider. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from additional security hardening and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with onf-agirpourlaforet.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review onf-agirpourlaforet.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.