Skip to main content

Security report for ondrejhauser.co.uk

www.ondrejhauser.co.uk · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.ondrejhauser.co.uk operates as an online gambling and sports betting platform targeting Thai-speaking users. It promotes a variety of betting services including football betting, casino games, slots, and lottery. The site positions itself as a leading and trusted platform in the Thai market, leveraging the popular 'ufabet' brand. However, the domain WHOIS data is missing and indicates the domain is invalid according to Nominet UK registry rules, which raises concerns about the legitimacy and ownership of the domain. The website is built on WordPress using Elementor and Yoast SEO, showing moderate technical maturity but lacks critical compliance and security features such as privacy policies, cookie consent, and security headers.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ondrejhauser.co.uk

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business model appears to be focused on online gambling and betting services, likely operating as an affiliate or direct betting platform. The target audience is mature Thai users interested in sports betting and casino games. The site claims a strong market position but lacks verifiable business registration or contact information, which limits trust and credibility. The presence of a partner domain (www.ufabetwins.gold) suggests a partnership ecosystem within the gambling niche. The lack of privacy and security policies, combined with domain registration issues, indicates potential operational risks and regulatory non-compliance.

Security posture

The security posture is weak, with no detected security headers, no privacy or cookie policies, and no incident response or security contact information. The site uses HTTPS (implied by canonical URLs) but lacks advanced security best practices. The absence of WHOIS data and domain registration irregularities further reduce trustworthiness. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure or data protection officer information. Overall, the site is at risk of regulatory and security compliance issues.

Recommendations

  1. Register a valid domain compliant with registry rules to establish legitimacy.
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms.
  3. Add clear contact information including support and security incident contacts.
  4. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to improve security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
www.ondrejhauser.co.uk
Description
เว็บพนันบอลออนไลน์ที่ดีที่สุด สมัครเว็บบอล เดิมพันบอลออนไลน์ทุกรูปแบบ ฝากถอน ไม่มีขั้นต่ำ โบนัสค่าคอมมิชชั่น คืนยอดเสีย 0.5%
Key services
Online football betting, Casino games, Slot games, Lottery, Other gambling services
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Swiper.js
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a Thai language gambling and sports betting platform.
  2. No WHOIS registration data available; domain appears invalid per registry.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided.
  5. No security headers detected in the HTML content.
  6. Website uses WordPress with Elementor and Yoast SEO plugins.
  7. External links include social media icons but no URLs specified.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  9. Content is gambling-related, targeted at mature audiences.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; content fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform with Elementor page builder and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a standard and maintainable technical stack. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets including jQuery and Swiper.js for UI components. Performance is moderate with some optimization for mobile devices. However, there is no evidence of advanced analytics or tracking tools. The lack of security headers and privacy compliance features indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business model but requires improvements in security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ondrejhauser.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ondrejhauser.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.