Skip to main content

Security report for ondrejfirla.eu

Ondřej Firla · Technology · Czech Republic

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ondřej Firla operates a professional web and graphic design business based in Olomouc, Czech Republic, with over 10 years of experience. The website showcases services including responsive web design, e-commerce solutions, custom CMS development, SEO optimization, and graphic design such as logos and corporate identity materials. The business targets local companies and individuals seeking quality digital and print design services. Technically, the site uses a custom CMS built on PHP with NETTE framework, JavaScript, and MySQL, hosted by WEDOS Internet, a.s. The site is mobile optimized and integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and reCAPTCHA on forms, but lacks important security headers and privacy compliance elements. No privacy or cookie policies are present, which is a compliance gap. The domain registration is consistent with the business history and shows no suspicious patterns. Overall, the site is professional and functional but could improve in security and privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ondrejfirla.eu

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ondrejfirla.eu, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for ondrejfirla.eu right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business is a small, local service provider specializing in web and graphic design, leveraging over a decade of experience. Its competitive advantage lies in personalized service and a custom CMS solution. Revenue streams likely come from client projects in web development, graphic design, and SEO services. The target market is regional businesses and individuals in Olomouc and nearby areas. The website includes some suspicious external links likely injected or spam-related, which should be addressed to maintain reputation. The company maintains clear contact information and business registration details, supporting credibility. No partnerships or subsidiaries are indicated.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is properly implemented with good SSL configuration. Google reCAPTCHA is used to protect forms from bots. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies are published. The site does not expose sensitive data in HTML, but the custom CMS may require security audits. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies and lack of consent mechanisms for tracking. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a small business but requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and enable HSTS.
  3. Conduct security audit of the custom CMS to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Remove or investigate suspicious external links embedded in hidden content to protect brand reputation.
  5. Publish vulnerability disclosure and incident response information to improve transparency and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Ondřej Firla
Registration number
74327402
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ondřej Firla
Description
Vytvářím webové stránky, internetové prezentace, loga, brožury a další grafiku. Webdesign Olomouc, tvorba www stránek, www stránky, profesionální internetové stránky, SEO optimalizace, Corporate identity.
Key services
Webdesign, Responsive web design, E-shop development, Redakční systém (CMS), SEO optimization, Graphic design including logos, brochures, corporate identity
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS, PHP, JavaScript, jQuery, MySQL, NETTE Framework
Frameworks
NETTE
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA v2 integrated on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional portfolio and service site for a Czech web and graphic designer.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Use of Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking without visible cookie consent.
  4. External links include several suspicious domains related to replica products, likely injected or spam content in hidden elements.
  5. Contact information is clearly presented with phone, email, and physical address.
  6. No visible security headers detected, which is a security improvement area.
  7. Site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration.
  8. Custom CMS used, which may require security review.
  9. No forms with visible fields except a contact form with reCAPTCHA integration.
  10. No social media links detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using a custom CMS based on PHP and the NETTE framework, with front-end technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and jQuery. It uses MySQL for database management. The hosting provider is WEDOS Internet, a.s., a known Czech hosting company. The site loads with moderate performance and is mobile responsive. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured content. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are integrated for analytics and marketing. The site lacks advanced accessibility features and security headers. The use of a custom CMS suggests potential technical debt and the need for ongoing maintenance and security updates. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small business but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ondrejfirla.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ondrejfirla.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.