Skip to main content

Security report for ondrejbecva.cz

Ondřej Bečva · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ondřej Bečva operates as a small-scale full-stack developer specializing in custom WordPress website development primarily for clients in the Czech Republic. The business emphasizes a professional and pragmatic approach to web development, integrating custom programming, API connections, and optimization services. The website showcases a portfolio of projects and partnerships with local brands, positioning itself as a trusted local technology service provider. Technically, the site uses modern web standards, Google Fonts, and integrates a third-party scheduling tool, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS implied, but lacks published security policies and headers, indicating room for improvement. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ondrejbecva.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ondrejbecva.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for ondrejbecva.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business targets small to medium enterprises and individuals seeking tailored web development solutions, leveraging WordPress as the primary CMS. Revenue streams include custom programming, website creation, maintenance, and advertising implementation. The company maintains partnerships with local brands and has a history of collaboration with other technology firms. The market position is niche and localized, focusing on quality and personalized service rather than scale. Growth potential exists through enhanced digital marketing and compliance improvements. The partnership ecosystem includes Softmedia s.r.o. and Doktor PC, indicating collaborative business models.

Security posture

The current security maturity is moderate. The website uses HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data or vulnerable scripts. However, it lacks explicit security headers and published security policies, which are important for defense-in-depth and compliance. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are visible, which could delay response to security events. GDPR compliance is incomplete due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The absence of forms reduces attack surface but also limits data collection transparency. Overall, the security culture appears basic but functional, with opportunities for strengthening policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Add a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure statement to facilitate incident reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards for broader user inclusivity.
  5. Regularly audit third-party integrations and scripts for vulnerabilities and privacy impact.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Ondřej Bečva
Registration number
07091702
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ondřej Bečva
Description
Specializes in custom website creation services with a professional approach, leveraging extensive experience from various projects to ensure online business success.
Key services
Custom WordPress website development, Custom programming and API integration, Data import/export for WordPress, Integration with real estate and CRM systems, Website migration and optimization, Website maintenance and updates, Advertising implementation (Google Adsense, Seznam.cz)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Fonts (Roboto), WordPress (mentioned as CMS), Zaptime scheduling iframe
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical link https://ondrejbecva.cz)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No forms detected collecting sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense, Seznam.cz
Marketing tools
Zaptime scheduling iframe
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Clear and professional contact information is provided.
  4. No forms detected on the page; contact is via phone, email, and social media links.
  5. Use of WordPress CMS and modern web fonts.
  6. Integration of third-party scheduling tool (Zaptime) via iframe.
  7. No visible security headers or explicit security policies published.
  8. Business is a small-scale full-stack developer focused on Czech market.
  9. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond scheduling iframe.
  10. No advertising scripts except mention of Google Adsense and Seznam.cz ads implementation services.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard HTML5 and CSS3 with Google Fonts integration, indicating modern front-end practices. WordPress is the CMS platform, which is widely used and supported. Hosting is provided by VAS Hosting, as indicated by the name servers. Performance is moderate with no explicit speed optimizations detected but no major issues either. Mobile responsiveness is good, supported by CSS media queries. SEO is supported by meta description and canonical tags. The use of an iframe for scheduling (Zaptime) is a modern approach to embedding third-party services but should be monitored for privacy and security implications. Technical debt appears low, but the absence of advanced frameworks or progressive web app features suggests room for modernization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ondrejbecva.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ondrejbecva.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.