Skip to main content

Security report for omr.com

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

OMR is a well-established online marketing platform with a domain registered since 1994, indicating a mature presence in the digital marketing space. The website focuses on providing content and resources related to online marketing, targeting professionals and enthusiasts in the digital marketing industry. The technical infrastructure leverages modern front-end technologies such as Tailwind CSS and is hosted with reliable providers including Google Domains for DNS and Amazon Registrar for domain registration. The website is accessible without any WAF or security challenges, indicating good availability and user access. However, the absence of explicit privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies suggests gaps in compliance and transparency. Security posture is moderate with domain status protections but lacks DNSSEC and visible security headers, which are recommended for enhanced security. Overall, the website demonstrates good professionalism and technical maturity but should improve privacy compliance and security best practices to strengthen trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of omr.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching omr.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention omr.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
123
Employees
0
Customers
107
Third parties
16
Weak passwords
26%

4 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for omr.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

OMR operates in the technology sector focusing on online marketing content and resources. The business model appears to be content-driven, targeting digital marketing professionals. The domain age and registrar information support a credible and stable business operation. No explicit business contact information or certifications were found, which limits deeper business intelligence insights. The platform likely generates revenue through content monetization or related marketing services. The lack of visible partner or subsidiary domains suggests a standalone operation or limited public partnerships. The website's consistent branding and good content quality position it well within its niche, though further transparency and contact details could enhance credibility.

Security posture

The security maturity of OMR is moderate. The domain is protected with clientDeleteProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, and clientUpdateProhibited statuses, preventing unauthorized domain changes. SSL is presumably enabled given the HTTPS URL, but DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended security enhancement. No security headers were detected in the provided data, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries in the analyzed content. The absence of explicit security policies or incident response contacts limits the ability to assess incident readiness. Overall, while basic protections are in place, the site would benefit from implementing DNSSEC, security headers, and publishing security policies to improve its security posture and compliance with regulations such as GDPR and NIS2.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to enhance transparency and GDPR compliance.
  4. Add explicit security and incident response policies with contact channels for vulnerability reporting.
  5. Improve accessibility features and SEO optimization to enhance user experience and search visibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
OMR is a platform focused on online marketing, providing content and resources related to digital marketing.
Key services
online marketing content, digital marketing resources
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Tailwind CSS, Google Domains DNS, Amazon Registrar
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided HTML content.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly found in the HTML content.
  4. No social media links or scripts for analytics or advertising detected in the truncated HTML content.
  5. Website uses modern CSS framework (Tailwind CSS) indicating up-to-date front-end technology.
  6. DNS is managed by Google Domains, and domain registrar is Amazon Registrar, indicating reliable infrastructure.
  7. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a recommended security enhancement.
  8. No visible security headers detected in the provided data.
  9. No forms or data collection fields detected in the provided HTML snippet.
  10. Content is professional and focused on online marketing topics.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Tailwind CSS, a modern utility-first CSS framework, indicating up-to-date front-end technology. The domain is registered with Amazon Registrar and DNS managed by Google Domains, reflecting reliable infrastructure. Performance is moderate based on the CSS framework and hosting providers, with good mobile optimization inferred from responsive CSS usage. No CMS or backend technologies were detected in the provided HTML snippet. The absence of analytics or advertising scripts suggests minimal tracking or marketing tools currently in use. The site lacks DNSSEC and security headers, representing technical risks that could be mitigated. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could be enhanced with additional security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100 +5Medium27 findingsView report
  2. 68/100Medium32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with omr.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review omr.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.