Security report for omnisnippet1.com
Omnisend · E-commerce · N/a
Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.
Omnisend operates as a specialized ecommerce-focused email and SMS marketing automation platform designed to empower ecommerce brands to increase revenue efficiently. The company offers a comprehensive suite of marketing tools including email campaigns, SMS, web push notifications, AI-driven personalization, and seamless integrations with major ecommerce platforms such as Shopify, WooCommerce, and BigCommerce. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional branding, clear messaging, and extensive content tailored to ecommerce marketers. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern front-end technologies including Swiper.js for sliders, Wistia for video hosting, and Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie consent management. The site is well-optimized for SEO and mobile responsiveness, leveraging Google Tag Manager and Visual Website Optimizer for analytics and A/B testing. Security best practices such as HTTPS and cookie consent are implemented, though some security headers could be improved. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates a solid posture with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of a public security policy or incident response information and lack of a vulnerability disclosure program represent areas for enhancement. The WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, which slightly reduces trustworthiness from a domain registration perspective but does not detract significantly given the professional web presence. Overall, Omnisend presents a credible and professional ecommerce marketing platform with strong technical and content quality. Strategic improvements in security transparency and WHOIS data availability could further enhance trust and compliance.
Scanned
NIS2 and GDPR posture
- GDPR outside view
- 88/ 100 · Low
- Checks completed
- 7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
- (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
- (b) Incident handling: One indicator
- (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
- (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
- (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
- (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
- (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
- (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
- (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
- (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.
SSL/TLS
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
- High
Weak SSL Key Length
SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak
What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key
- CWE-326
- OWASP A04:2025
- Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048
- NIS2 21(2)(h)
- IR 2024/2690 9.2(b): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(b): Cryptography
- NIST SC-13: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-13: Cryptographic Protection
- High
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
Keep watching omnisnippet1.com
This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended€25per month
- TLS certificates and expiry
- DNS records
- SPF, DKIM and DMARC
- Security headers
- GDPR and NIS2 posture
- Exposed services
- Third-party trackers
- Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
- The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
- Email delivery with an unlock code
- Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
- SSL/TLS
- 75
- Security headers
- 65
- Email security
- 88
- DNS health
- 85
- Network security
- 100
- GDPR outside view
- 88
- Average
- 84
Not counted
- NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
- OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
- The certificate is not trusted by browsers
- The website is not served over HTTPS
- A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
- The page loads a script from a compromised source
- The domain registration has expired
- SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
- Critical0–25
- High26–49
- Medium50–75
- Low76–100
Technical appendix
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Security posture
Recommendations
- Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan on the website.
- Add and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
- Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
- Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to minimize risk from dependencies.
- Enhance WHOIS transparency if possible to improve domain registration trustworthiness.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
- Company
- Omnisend
- Description
- Omnisend is an ecommerce-tailored email & SMS marketing automation platform built to help nimble teams drive more revenue without increasing their workload. One-click ecommerce stack integrations, pre-built workflows, and intuitive drag & drop editing make it easy to get up & running without diving into the smallest details, unless you want to.
- Key services
- email marketing automation, SMS marketing, web push notifications, pre-built workflows, AI-driven personalization, integrations with ecommerce platforms
- Content quality
- excellent
- Branding
- consistent
Technology
- Stack
- WordPress, Google Tag Manager, Wistia video embeds, Swiper.js, Cookiebot, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO), Yoast SEO plugin
- Frameworks
- WordPress theme framework
- Platforms
- WordPress CMS
- Performance
- moderate
- Mobile
- excellent
- Accessibility
- good
- SEO
- excellent
Security
- Observed score
- 85/100
- Good practices seen
- HTTPS enforced
- Cookie consent mechanism implemented
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- Use of Google Tag Manager for controlled script loading
Analytics and tracking
- Services
- Google Tag Manager, Visual Website Optimizer
- Tracking level
- moderate
- Privacy practices
- good
Advertising
- Tracking pixels
- Visual Website Optimizer, Cookiebot
- Marketing tools
- Cookiebot, Visual Website Optimizer, Wistia
- Transparency
- good
Site quality
- Design
- excellent
- User experience
- excellent
- Content relevance
- excellent
- Navigation
- excellent
- Professionalism
- excellent
- Trustworthiness
- high
Key observations
- Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
- No WHOIS data available from raw output, indicating privacy protection or query on incorrect domain variant.
- Strong SEO and structured data implementation.
- Multiple integrations and partner references to major ecommerce platforms.
- No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
- Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented and GDPR compliant.
- No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities detected in HTML content.
- Use of modern JavaScript libraries and marketing tools.
- No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes
Notes
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
- MITRE CWE (opens in a new tab)4.20 (2026-04-30) · CWE Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP Top 10:2025 (opens in a new tab)2025 (membership per CWE 4.20) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- MITRE CAPEC (opens in a new tab)3.9 (2023-01-24) · CAPEC Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP ASVS (opens in a new tab)5.0.0 · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Web Security Testing Guide (opens in a new tab)latest (checklist.json, master) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Secure Headers Project (opens in a new tab)2026-10-18 · Apache-2.0
- Mozilla Server Side TLS (intermediate) (opens in a new tab)6.0 · MPL-2.0
- NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 (OSCAL catalog) (opens in a new tab)5.2.0 · Public domain (US Government work)
- Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 333, 27.12.2022 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 (opens in a new tab)OJ L, 18.10.2024 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 119, 4.5.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive 2002/58/EC (ePrivacy), consolidated (opens in a new tab)19.12.2009 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- RFC Editor metadata (opens in a new tab)per-RFC (obsolete RFCs rejected) · IETF Trust Legal Provisions (metadata only)
- NIST CSRC, W3C TR, IETF Datatracker, EDPB, EUR-Lex CELLAR and gesetze-bayern.de (opens in a new tab)per document · Titles and links only
- NIST NVD CVE API 2.0 (opens in a new tab)live records · Public domain (NVD); CVE® records © MITRE, free use
- W3C WCAG 2.2 (opens in a new tab)W3C Recommendation (wcag.json) · W3C Software and Document License
- ETSI EN 301 549 (opens in a new tab)V3.2.1 (2021-03), clause headings · Clause numbers and titles only (© ETSI)
- Directive (EU) 2019/882 (European Accessibility Act) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 151, 7.6.2019 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive (EU) 2016/2102 (Web Accessibility Directive) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 327, 2.12.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Earlier scans of this domain
- 86/100 +1Low19 findingsView report
- 85/100Low19 findingsView report
Feedback on this report
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with omnisnippet1.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review omnisnippet1.com.