Skip to main content

Security report for omnisend.com

Just a moment... · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website omnisend.com is currently inaccessible due to a Cloudflare Web Application Firewall (WAF) security challenge page that blocks direct access to the actual content. As a result, no business-specific information, metadata, or contact details are available for analysis. The site lacks a valid SSL certificate and does not support HTTPS, which is a critical security deficiency. The technical infrastructure relies on Cloudflare for DNS and security services, but the absence of TLS protocols and certificate transparency compliance indicates a weak security posture. Due to the blocked content, privacy and compliance policies cannot be verified, and no forms or user interaction elements are visible. Overall, the site’s digital maturity and security posture cannot be fully assessed, and the risk level is elevated due to missing HTTPS and content inaccessibility.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of omnisend.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching omnisend.com

This scan found 12 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
65
Email security
50
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Without access to the actual website content, it is not possible to determine the company's market positioning, business model, or target audience. The domain is registered and uses Cloudflare DNS and security services, which is standard for many businesses. However, the lack of visible business information, contact details, or trust indicators limits the ability to evaluate competitive advantages or partnership ecosystems. The domain’s DNS configuration shows use of Google MX records and multiple domain verification TXT records, suggesting integration with common marketing and email platforms, but no direct business intelligence can be extracted from the blocked page.

Security posture

The security posture is weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS support. Although several security headers are present, including strict cross-origin policies and permissions policies, the failure to enable TLS protocols and HSTS reduces overall security effectiveness. The Cloudflare WAF challenge indicates some level of protection against attacks, but the inability to access the site content prevents a full security assessment. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The site should prioritize obtaining a valid SSL certificate and enabling HTTPS to improve trust and security.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and properly configure a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the site.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3) and disable insecure protocols.
  3. Configure HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload flags to enforce HTTPS usage.
  4. Review and update security headers to ensure comprehensive protection.
  5. Provide accessible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to improve compliance and user trust.
Technical notes

Notes

The site is hosted behind Cloudflare, which provides DNS and security services. The HTTP headers indicate use of advanced security policies such as cross-origin policies and permissions policies restricting many browser features. However, the SSL configuration is invalid with no TLS protocols enabled, which is a critical technical flaw. The page load and resource metrics are zero due to the content being blocked by the Cloudflare challenge. No CMS or frameworks can be detected from the limited HTML content. The site’s mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO cannot be evaluated due to lack of content. The presence of Cloudflare Insights analytics indicates some level of traffic monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 84/100 −3Low21 findingsView report
  2. 87/100 +15Low17 findingsView report
  3. 72/100Medium20 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with omnisend.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review omnisend.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.