Skip to main content

Security report for omax.com

OMAX Corporation · Manufacturing · United States

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

OMAX Corporation, a subsidiary of Hypertherm, is a well-established manufacturer specializing in abrasive waterjet cutting machines and related precision cutting technologies. The company targets industrial and manufacturing sectors requiring high-precision machining solutions. Their website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, structured data, and multi-language support, indicating a global market reach. Technically, the site leverages Drupal CMS and integrates multiple analytics and advertising platforms, including Google Tag Manager, Bing UET, and New Relic, demonstrating a modern and data-driven infrastructure. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are absent, representing an area for improvement. The WHOIS data is notably missing or inaccessible, which raises some concerns about domain registration transparency, but the overall business credibility remains high due to the association with Hypertherm and consistent branding. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security transparency, publishing privacy and incident response policies, and verifying domain registration details to strengthen trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching omax.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
55
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

OMAX operates in the manufacturing sector with a focus on industrial waterjet cutting technology. Their business model is B2B, serving manufacturers and engineering firms globally. The company benefits from its parent company Hypertherm's reputation, which enhances market positioning and trust. The website's multi-language support and detailed product lines indicate a broad international customer base. Revenue streams likely include direct sales of machinery, parts, and support services. The presence of a dedicated support domain suggests a structured customer service ecosystem. The company leverages digital marketing and analytics tools to optimize customer engagement and lead generation. No direct evidence of certifications or compliance beyond GDPR-related cookie consent was found, suggesting potential areas for business process enhancement.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting compliance with basic privacy regulations. Multiple tracking and analytics scripts are used, which require careful management to avoid privacy risks. Security headers are not explicitly visible in the provided data, and no security or incident response policies are published, indicating gaps in transparency and readiness. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file limits external reporting capabilities. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by publishing clear security policies, implementing comprehensive security headers, and providing incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  2. Implement and verify security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency and trust.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by providing a comprehensive privacy policy and detailed cookie usage disclosures.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
OMAX Corporation
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
OMAX Corporation
Description
OMAX Corp, a Hypertherm Company, is the manufacturer of easy-to-use abrasive waterjet machines, water jet cutters, and personal water jet cutting machines for precision cutting and machining of virtually any material.
Key services
Manufacture and sale of abrasive waterjet machines, Water jet cutters, Personal water jet cutting machines
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Ads, Bing UET, New Relic, Vidyard video embed, Drupal CMS, jQuery UI, OneTrust cookie consent, Microsoft Web Tracking SDK
Frameworks
Drupal
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Bing UET for tracking
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Bing UET, New Relic, Microsoft Web Tracking
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
Google Ads Remarketing, Bing UET, Microsoft Web Tracking
Marketing tools
New Relic
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to industrial manufacturing.
  3. Strong use of structured data and social media integration.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy mechanisms are implemented.
  5. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, raising some legitimacy questions.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies found on site.
  7. Multiple external tracking and advertising scripts detected.
  8. No contact forms detected in provided HTML snippet; contact info mainly via phone and address in structured data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal CMS and uses a modern technology stack including Google Tag Manager, Bing UET, New Relic, and Microsoft Web Tracking SDK for analytics and performance monitoring. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices including meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, with multiple external scripts that may impact load times. The site uses HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications. No hosting provider details were identified from the data. The technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable online presence but could benefit from performance optimization and enhanced security header implementation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with omax.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review omax.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.