Skip to main content

Security report for omappapi.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website omappapi.com is currently inaccessible due to a Cloudflare Web Application Firewall (WAF) blocking page, which prevents access to any substantive content or business information. The domain is registered since 2020 with GoDaddy.com, LLC and shows standard domain status locks but lacks DNSSEC, which is a recommended security enhancement. Due to the WAF block, no privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are detectable, nor is there any contact or business information available on the landing page. The technical infrastructure is limited to Cloudflare's security services, and no additional technologies or CMS platforms are identifiable. The site’s security posture cannot be fully assessed, but the lack of DNSSEC and security headers is noted as an area for improvement. Overall, the site’s trustworthiness and professionalism cannot be evaluated due to the lack of accessible content.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of omappapi.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching omappapi.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
35
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

No business intelligence data is available from the accessible content. The domain age suggests a relatively new entity, but no company name, description, or services are presented. There are no visible partnerships, certifications, or trust indicators. The absence of contact information and policies limits the ability to assess market positioning, business model, or customer targeting. The domain registration is consistent and stable, indicating legitimacy, but the lack of public-facing information suggests either a development stage or restricted access.

Security posture

The website is protected by Cloudflare’s WAF, which currently blocks access, indicating an active security posture against potential threats. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers reduces the overall security maturity. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The site does not expose sensitive data or forms, reducing immediate risk, but the inability to access content limits comprehensive security evaluation. Compliance with GDPR or other regulations cannot be confirmed due to missing policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and trust.
  2. Publish accessible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to comply with legal requirements and improve transparency.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer and security incident communication.
  4. Implement and expose security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve security posture.
  5. Review WAF rules to avoid blocking legitimate users and enable access for security analysis and user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Cloudflare detected. Website content is blocked by Cloudflare security service with a challenge page indicating user access is denied. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare

Analytics and tracking

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is currently inaccessible due to Cloudflare WAF blocking the visitor
  2. No visible business or contact information on the landing page
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  4. No forms or data collection mechanisms detected
  5. No analytics or advertising scripts detected
  6. Minimal HTML content consistent with a security challenge page
  7. Domain registration is stable and not privacy protected
  8. DNSSEC not enabled which is a security improvement opportunity
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted behind Cloudflare, which provides CDN and security services including WAF. The HTML content is minimal and indicative of a security challenge page, with no visible CMS or additional frameworks detected. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a security gap. No analytics, advertising, or tracking scripts are present. Performance, mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO cannot be assessed due to lack of content. The domain registration is stable and consistent but lacks registrant detail exposure. Overall, the technical infrastructure is basic and focused on security protection rather than content delivery.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 66/100Medium30 findingsView report
  2. 66/100 +2Medium30 findingsView report
  3. 64/100Medium26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with omappapi.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review omappapi.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.