Skip to main content

Security report for omahotel.com

Other · N/a

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Oma Hotel operates as a niche adult entertainment website specializing in mature and granny-themed content, offering pictures and videos primarily targeting adults aged 65 to 95. The business model revolves around membership access and affiliate marketing partnerships with related adult sites. The website's market position is focused on a specific adult niche, with limited transparency regarding company details or domain registration. Technically, the site is built with basic HTML and CSS, lacking modern frameworks or CMS platforms, and shows poor mobile optimization and accessibility. Security posture is weak, with no HTTPS detected in the provided data, absence of security headers, and no privacy or cookie policies, which raises compliance concerns. The lack of WHOIS data and registrant information further reduces trustworthiness. Overall, the site presents significant risks from a security and compliance perspective, with minimal business credibility and poor technical implementation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching omahotel.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website targets a mature adult audience interested in explicit granny content, monetizing through memberships and affiliate programs linked to sister sites like oldnanny.com and omacash.com. The absence of clear business registration or contact information suggests a low level of corporate transparency. The niche focus may provide competitive advantage within its segment, but the lack of compliance and security measures could hinder growth and expose the business to legal risks. Partnerships with related adult sites indicate an ecosystem approach to content distribution and monetization.

Security posture

The security maturity of the website is low. Critical issues include the absence of HTTPS, no visible security headers, and no privacy or cookie policies, which are essential for GDPR and other regulatory compliance. The site lacks incident response or security contact information, limiting its ability to handle security events effectively. The missing WHOIS data and domain registration transparency further undermine trust. These factors collectively expose the site to potential data breaches, legal liabilities, and reputational damage.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure user data and improve trust.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Add clear contact information and a security incident response channel to improve transparency.
  4. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility to improve user experience and broaden audience reach.
  5. Conduct a full security audit to identify and remediate vulnerabilities and implement security best practices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Grannies from 65 to 95. the Oldest Grannies in action. the biggest and oldest granny & mature site. over 15 GB of pictures & videos
Key services
Adult videos, Adult pictures, Membership access to adult content
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
20/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content site focused on mature/granny pornography.
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating possible domain registration issues or privacy.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. No contact information or security policies disclosed.
  5. Site uses basic HTML and CSS with no modern frameworks or CMS detected.
  6. Affiliate marketing is present linking to related adult sites.
  7. No HTTPS or security headers detected in provided data.
  8. Content is explicit and targeted at adults only with age verification disclaimer.
  9. Mobile optimization and accessibility are poor.
  10. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic HTML and CSS without modern frameworks or CMS, resulting in limited functionality and poor mobile responsiveness. No JavaScript libraries or analytics tools were detected, indicating minimal technical sophistication. The absence of HTTPS and security headers is a critical technical deficiency. The site’s performance is moderate but could be improved with modern hosting and optimization techniques. The lack of SEO optimization and accessibility features limits discoverability and usability. Overall, the technical infrastructure is outdated and requires modernization to meet current web standards and security requirements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with omahotel.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review omahotel.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.