Skip to main content

Security report for olympiabewerbung-muenchen.com

Olympiabewerbung München · Government · Germany

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.olympiabewerbung-muenchen.com is a professionally designed government-related campaign site promoting Munich's bid for the Olympic and Paralympic Summer Games starting from 2036. It targets citizens and stakeholders in Munich and Bavaria, aiming to inform and engage the public about the bid's vision, concept, and benefits. The site uses WordPress CMS with modern front-end technologies including JavaScript libraries like Plyr and Swiper, and employs Matomo for analytics. The content is rich, well-structured, and visually appealing, supporting a positive user experience and clear navigation. However, the site lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, security headers, and incident response contact information, which are important for compliance and security posture. The WHOIS data for the domain is missing or unavailable, which raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, though the official nature of the content suggests a legitimate campaign. Overall, the site scores well on content quality and business credibility but needs improvements in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching olympiabewerbung-muenchen.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
50
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
65
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention olympiabewerbung-muenchen.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for olympiabewerbung-muenchen.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

This site represents a government initiative to promote Munich's Olympic bid, positioning itself as an official and authoritative source of information. The business model is informational and public engagement focused, with no direct commercial transactions. The target audience includes local citizens, sports enthusiasts, and stakeholders interested in the Olympic Games and city development. The site leverages partnerships with official city and state entities, as indicated by references to the Free State of Bavaria and the City of Munich. Growth indicators include ongoing updates and multimedia content to maintain public interest. The campaign benefits from a strong branding consistency and trust signals such as official logos and endorsements from city officials.

Security posture

The website currently exhibits a moderate security posture. HTTPS is presumably enabled (based on URL scheme), but no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data. There is no visible privacy policy or cookie consent mechanism, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting the ability to report or respond to security incidents. The use of third-party scripts like Matomo and embedded YouTube videos introduces potential risk vectors that should be regularly audited. Overall, the site should enhance its security headers, implement clear privacy and cookie policies, and provide incident response contacts to improve its security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the site against common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and designate a data protection officer if applicable.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Olympiabewerbung München
Description
München möchte sich mit Unterstützung des Freistaats Bayern für die Olympischen und Paralympischen Sommerspiele ab dem Jahr 2036 bewerben. Im ersten Schritt muss das Münchner Konzept dafür vom Deutschen Olympischen Sportbund im Vergleich mit den anderen interessierten Regionen Berlin, Hamburg und Rhein-Ruhr als bestes Konzept ausgewählt werden.
Key services
Information dissemination about Olympic bid, Public engagement, Promotion of city development projects
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML5, Plyr media player, Swiper slider, Yoast SEO plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Matomo analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional campaign site for Munich's Olympic bid for 2036 or later.
  2. Content is comprehensive, well-structured, and visually rich with images and videos.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the content.
  4. No privacy or cookie policies explicitly linked or found.
  5. No security or incident response contact information found.
  6. WHOIS data is missing or domain appears unregistered in WHOIS database.
  7. Uses Matomo analytics for tracking with moderate user tracking level.
  8. No signs of adult or NSFW content.
  9. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern front-end stack including JavaScript libraries for media playback and sliders. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices implemented via Yoast SEO plugin. Performance is moderate, with multiple high-resolution images and embedded videos that may impact load times. Hosting provider details are not explicit. The site uses Matomo analytics for user tracking, indicating a preference for privacy-respecting analytics over mainstream providers. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in security configurations and privacy compliance are needed to reduce risk and enhance user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with olympiabewerbung-muenchen.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review olympiabewerbung-muenchen.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.