Skip to main content

Security report for olvi.fi

Olvi · Manufacturing · Finland

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Olvi is a well-established Finnish beverage manufacturing and retail company with a history dating back to 1878. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence targeting Finnish consumers and the beverage market. The digital infrastructure is built on WordPress with modern plugins for SEO and multilingual support, indicating a mature technical setup. The site employs multiple third-party analytics and advertising services, with a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism that aligns with GDPR requirements. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, but lacks explicit security headers and incident response information. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professionally maintained, though improvements in privacy policy visibility and security disclosures are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching olvi.fi

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
80
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Olvi operates primarily in the manufacturing and retail sectors of the beverage industry in Finland. Its long-standing market presence and established brand provide competitive advantages. The business model focuses on beverage production and direct consumer engagement through retail channels. The website's use of multilingual support and SEO plugins suggests an intent to reach broader audiences, possibly including international visitors. Partnerships with advertising and analytics providers indicate a data-driven marketing approach. The absence of explicit contact information and privacy policies on the main page may limit direct customer engagement and compliance transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to strong security posture with HTTPS enforced and a detailed cookie consent mechanism that categorizes cookies and allows granular user control. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are present, which could hinder timely security communication. The extensive use of third-party scripts increases the attack surface but is managed through consent. Overall, the site is secure but could benefit from enhanced security best practices and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a clear privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the homepage.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to improve security posture.
  3. Provide explicit contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer and security incident reporting.
  4. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and cookies to minimize privacy risks and ensure compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Olvi
Description
Olvi is a Finnish company established in 1878, operating in beverage manufacturing and retail sectors.
Key services
Beverage production, Retail sales
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics, Cookiebot, Font Awesome, WPBakery Page Builder, Yoast SEO, WPML (WordPress Multilingual Plugin)
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent banner with granular consent options
  • Use of secure cookies (implied by Cookiebot usage)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Ontame.io, Snowplow Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc., Adform
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, ReachMee
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed cookie categories and granular consent options.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in the provided content.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the visible content.
  5. Website uses modern WordPress CMS with common plugins for SEO and multilingual support.
  6. Extensive use of third-party analytics and advertising services with clear cookie disclosures.
  7. Security headers are not explicitly detected; opportunity for improvement.
  8. No visible security or incident response policies or contacts.
  9. Good branding consistency and professional design.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using WPBakery Page Builder and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a standard and widely supported platform. It leverages jQuery and Font Awesome for UI elements and icons. The site integrates Cookiebot for cookie consent management and Google Analytics for visitor tracking. Multilingual support is provided by WPML. Performance is moderate with standard external dependencies. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO practices are implemented via meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). There is room for improvement in accessibility and security header implementation. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with olvi.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review olvi.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.