Skip to main content

Security report for olivers.dk

OLIVERS · E-commerce · Denmark

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

OLIVERS is a well-established Danish e-commerce business specializing in premium dog and cat food, operating since 1998. The company offers a broad range of natural pet food products, subscription services, and expert customer support, positioning itself as a trusted provider in the Danish pet food market. Their website reflects a mature digital presence with integration of modern technologies and marketing tools.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
75/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching olivers.dk

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
75
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets Danish pet owners with a focus on quality and natural ingredients. Their business model centers on direct online sales, supported by a membership program (Club OLIVERS) offering discounts and benefits. The presence of multiple marketing and analytics integrations indicates a data-driven approach to customer engagement and retention. The company maintains a strong brand presence with consistent messaging and trust signals such as Trustpilot reviews.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with good SSL configuration and implements key security headers, enhancing protection against common web threats. The use of a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism demonstrates compliance with privacy regulations. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy or incident response page suggests room for improvement in transparency and preparedness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page to enhance transparency.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ emails.
  3. Consider implementing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
OLIVERS
VAT number
DK-26603129
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
OLIVERS
Description
OLIVERS har leveret kvalitetsfoder til danske hunde- og katteejere siden 1998. I dag finder du alt til det gode hunde- og katteliv på olivers.dk
Key services
Online sales of dog and cat food, Subscription services, Customer support and expert advice, Club OLIVERS membership with discounts
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, React (ScandiPWA), Google Tag Manager, New Relic, Cookiebot, Klaviyo, VWO (Visual Website Optimizer), Trustpilot widget
Frameworks
ScandiPWA
Platforms
Magento (implied by ScandiPWA and static paths)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, New Relic, Hotjar, Snowplow Analytics, VWO, Klaviyo
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Criteo, Neustar, Media.net, Casale Media, Teads, Triplelift, Bidswitch, Microsoft, RhythmOne, Unruly, Twiago, Mediavine
Tracking pixels
Google Adsense, Facebook Pixel, TikTok Pixel, VWO, Hotjar, Yotpo, Loggly
Marketing tools
Klaviyo, VWO, Trustpilot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Comprehensive cookie consent with detailed categories and descriptions
  2. Multiple trust signals including Trustpilot integration and clear contact info
  3. Use of modern PWA framework (ScandiPWA) on Magento platform
  4. Extensive use of third-party marketing and analytics tools
  5. No critical security issues or WAF blocking detected
  6. Clear business focus on Danish pet food e-commerce
  7. Responsive and mobile-optimized design
  8. No visible exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Magento with the ScandiPWA framework, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries and integrations such as Google Tag Manager, New Relic, and Klaviyo. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. The site includes comprehensive SEO meta tags and structured data for enhanced search engine visibility. Technical debt appears minimal, though ongoing monitoring of third-party dependencies is advised to maintain security and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with olivers.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review olivers.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.