Skip to main content

Security report for okomo.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website okomo.com is currently a parked domain primarily used for domain leasing or sales. It lacks any substantive business content, services, or contact information. The site displays a prominent banner advertising the domain's availability for lease or joint venture, targeting domain investors or buyers. The technical infrastructure is minimal, relying on basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with Google Adsense and Google Ad Services scripts for monetization. There is no evidence of a content management system or advanced frameworks. Security posture is weak, with no visible security headers or HTTPS confirmation, and no privacy or cookie consent mechanisms implemented. WHOIS data raises concerns due to a future domain creation date and registration via a drop-catching registrar, indicating low legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, the site presents a low-risk profile but lacks business credibility and security maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching okomo.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
25
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The domain okomo.com is positioned as a high-profile domain name available for lease or licensing, targeting domain investors and businesses seeking memorable domain names. There is no active business operation or service offering on the site. Revenue is likely generated through domain sales or advertising via Google Adsense. The absence of business contact details or company information limits trust and credibility. The domain's registration through a drop-catching service suggests speculative ownership rather than an established enterprise. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident. The business model is focused on domain monetization rather than product or service delivery.

Security posture

The website exhibits a low security maturity level. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options. No incident response or security policy information is provided. The lack of privacy and cookie consent mechanisms indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. WHOIS data inconsistencies further reduce trust. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content, but the minimal security posture and lack of best practices present potential risks if the domain is repurposed for active business use.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Implement standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to protect against common web attacks.
  3. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  4. Provide clear contact information and establish an incident response process to improve trust and security readiness.
  5. Review and correct WHOIS registration data to reflect accurate domain creation date and registrant information.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website appears to be a parked domain with a sales/lease offer banner for the domain name. No business description or services are provided.
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Adsense, Google Ad Services
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense, Google Ad Services
Tracking pixels
Google Ad Services cookie.js
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a parked domain with a sales/lease offer banner
  2. No business content or services offered
  3. No contact information or forms present
  4. No privacy or cookie consent mechanisms implemented
  5. No security headers or HTTPS status visible from provided data
  6. WHOIS data shows future creation date and drop-catching registrar
  7. Advertising scripts from Google Adsense and Google Ad Services present
  8. No social media or external business links found
  9. Minimal content and basic design
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript with embedded Google Adsense and Google Ad Services scripts for advertising. There is no detected CMS or advanced web framework. The site is mobile responsive at a basic level and uses simple styling variables for colors and fonts. Performance is likely moderate given minimal content and external ad scripts. Accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic, with no advanced metadata or structured data present. Hosting details are unclear but the domain uses name servers associated with giantpanda.com, possibly a domain parking or monetization service. The domain registrar is DropCatch.com, a known drop-catching service, which aligns with the domain's parked status.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with okomo.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review okomo.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.