Vorlíček Okna a dveře · Manufacturing · Czech Republic
Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.
Vorlíček Okna a dveře is a Czech-based manufacturer and supplier specializing in high-quality plastic and aluminum windows, doors, shading technology, ventilation systems, pergolas, and garage doors. Established in 1997, the company serves residential and commercial building markets primarily within the Czech Republic. Their business model integrates manufacturing, direct sales, consultation, installation, and after-sales service, positioning them as a reputable medium-sized player with a strong regional footprint. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with detailed product categorization and customer references, supporting their market credibility. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and OwlCarousel, alongside analytics and tracking tools including Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and Adform. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices and clear navigation, though some accessibility features appear basic. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. The absence of explicit CMS or hosting provider details limits deeper infrastructure insights. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and implements a cookie consent mechanism, indicating awareness of privacy compliance. However, no explicit privacy policy or terms of service were found, and security headers are not detected, which could expose the site to certain risks. The WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable, raising concerns about domain registration transparency and trustworthiness. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present, suggesting limited formal security governance. Overall, the website is functional, professional, and business-focused but would benefit from enhanced transparency in domain registration, explicit privacy and security policies, and improved security header implementation. These improvements would strengthen trust and compliance posture, reducing potential risks and enhancing customer confidence.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Cloudflare, Google APIs
What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention oknavorlicek.cz, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for oknavorlicek.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with oknavorlicek.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review oknavorlicek.cz.