Skip to main content

Security report for ojalagroup.com

Leden Group · Manufacturing · Finland

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Leden Group Oy is a Finnish manufacturing company specializing in metal-based contract manufacturing, steel service center operations, and production of cold roll formed steel profiles. The company is positioned as a leading partner in the Baltic region, offering comprehensive OEM services from design to logistics. It is part of the HANZA Group, which enhances its market presence and operational capabilities. The website reflects a medium-sized enterprise with a professional digital presence, leveraging WordPress and Elementor for content management and user experience. Technical infrastructure includes modern JavaScript libraries and consent management tools, indicating a mature digital strategy. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement and domain transfer protections, though improvements such as DNSSEC and security headers could enhance resilience. Privacy compliance is supported by Usercentrics consent mechanisms, though explicit privacy and security policies could be more comprehensive. Overall, the website and business demonstrate high trustworthiness and professionalism, suitable for industrial clients seeking reliable manufacturing partnerships.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ojalagroup.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
53
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Leden Group operates in the manufacturing sector with a focus on metal components and assemblies. Its business model centers on contract manufacturing and steel service provision, targeting industrial clients requiring complex system integration and component supply. The company’s affiliation with HANZA Group suggests strategic growth and access to broader markets. Recent press releases and acquisitions indicate active expansion and investment in modern technologies. The company maintains a clear brand identity and consistent messaging across multiple languages, enhancing its appeal in the Nordic and Baltic regions. Its digital ecosystem includes social media engagement and structured data for SEO, supporting competitive positioning. The absence of phone contact but presence of email and contact forms suggests a preference for digital communication channels.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses clientTransferProhibited domain status, which protects against unauthorized domain transfers. Consent management via Usercentrics is implemented, supporting GDPR compliance. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no Content-Security-Policy header was detected, representing potential security enhancements. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, which could limit transparency in security matters. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by adopting additional DNS and HTTP security measures and publishing clear security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement a Content-Security-Policy HTTP header to mitigate cross-site scripting risks.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and plugins to minimize vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Leden Group Oy
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Leden Group
Description
Leden Group is a metal-based manufacturing partner managing everything from complex systems to smaller components. It provides contract manufacturing, steel service center operations, and cold roll formed steel profiles manufacturing.
Key services
Contract manufacturing, Steel service center, Cold roll formed steel profiles, Sheet metal forming, Machining and turning, Busbars and flatbars, Surface treatment, Welded and mechanical assemblies, Product data management, Sourcing and logistics
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, Usercentrics (consent management), Google Tag Manager, Swiper.js (carousel), Owl Carousel, Font Awesome
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Consent management implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Usercentrics
Marketing tools
Usercentrics Consent Management
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and multilingual support.
  2. Consent management is implemented via Usercentrics, indicating GDPR awareness.
  3. No explicit privacy policy page found but code of conduct page likely covers some privacy aspects.
  4. Contact form collects name, email, company, and message with anti-spam honeypot field.
  5. Social media presence on Facebook and LinkedIn is active and linked.
  6. No phone numbers explicitly labeled as company contact found in the HTML.
  7. No terms of service or security incident response information found.
  8. Multiple recent press releases and news articles indicate active business operations.
  9. Website uses modern JavaScript libraries and WordPress CMS with Elementor builder.
  10. No signs of malware, phishing, or suspicious domains detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Elementor page builder, supported by jQuery and modern JavaScript libraries such as Swiper.js and Owl Carousel for interactive elements. Consent management is handled by Usercentrics, integrated with Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing tags. The site is multilingual, supporting English, Finnish, Swedish, and Norwegian, enhancing regional accessibility. Performance is moderate with some optimization potential. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by structured data (JSON-LD) and meta tags. Hosting and domain registration are managed by reputable providers, with domain age consistent with company history. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-maintained, supporting business operations effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ojalagroup.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ojalagroup.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.