Skip to main content

Security report for oishi-tm.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.oishi-tm.com is currently inaccessible due to a web application firewall (WAF) or security challenge page that blocks direct access to its content. The page displays a message in Chinese indicating that the page is protected and undergoing decryption, with encrypted JavaScript content that attempts to decrypt and load the actual page dynamically. Due to this protection, no meaningful business or contact information is available for analysis. The WHOIS lookup for the domain failed to return any registration data, suggesting the domain may be unregistered, newly registered, or privacy-protected with no public data. This lack of transparency and accessibility significantly limits the ability to assess the company's business model, services, or security posture. The site does not present any privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies, nor does it provide contact details or security incident response information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching oishi-tm.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
74
Security headers
85
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
50
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Given the absence of accessible content and WHOIS data, no reliable business intelligence can be derived. The domain's lack of registration information and the presence of a WAF challenge page raise concerns about legitimacy and operational transparency. No external partnerships, certifications, or social media presence are evident. The single external link points to www.bt.cn, likely related to the WAF provider rather than a business partner. Without accessible content, the target audience, market position, and business model remain unknown.

Security posture

The website employs a generic WAF or security challenge mechanism that encrypts and decrypts page content dynamically, which is a positive security measure to prevent automated scraping or attacks. However, no security headers or SSL configuration details are available for evaluation. The absence of privacy policies, contact information, and incident response channels indicates a low maturity level in security governance and compliance. The lack of WHOIS data further reduces trustworthiness. Overall, the security posture is weak from a transparency and compliance perspective, despite the presence of a WAF.

Recommendations

  1. Remove or properly configure the WAF challenge to allow legitimate users and security tools to access the website content for transparency and analysis.
  2. Register the domain properly and ensure WHOIS data is publicly available or provide justified privacy protection.
  3. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies compliant with GDPR and other regulations.
  4. Provide comprehensive contact information including emails, phone numbers, and physical addresses.
  5. Implement standard security headers and ensure HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate is enforced.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. The website content is blocked behind a security challenge page with a message in Chinese '网页被保护，正在解密中...' indicating the page is protected and decrypting. The page includes encrypted content and JavaScript to decrypt it, typical of a WAF or anti-bot protection. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, AES encryption (forge library)
SEO
poor

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is inaccessible due to a WAF or security challenge page.
  2. No meaningful business content or metadata is available.
  3. No contact information, privacy policy, or terms of service found.
  4. No WHOIS data available, indicating possible domain registration issues.
  5. Only one external link found to www.bt.cn, likely related to the WAF provider.
  6. Page uses JavaScript with AES encryption to decrypt content dynamically.
  7. No SEO or accessibility features detected.
  8. No analytics or advertising scripts detected.
  9. No social media or business identifiers found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses JavaScript with AES encryption (forge library) to protect content behind a security challenge. No CMS or hosting provider information is detectable. The page lacks meta tags, SEO optimization, and accessibility features. Performance and mobile optimization cannot be assessed due to blocked content. The technical implementation appears minimal and focused on content protection rather than user experience or SEO. There is an opportunity to modernize the site with standard web technologies and improve transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with oishi-tm.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review oishi-tm.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.