Skip to main content

Security report for oim.dk

Indenrigs- og Sundhedsministeriet · Government · Denmark

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and DNS health.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Indenrigs- og Sundhedsministeriet is the official Danish Ministry responsible for internal affairs and health policy. The website serves as a central platform for disseminating information about health initiatives, patient rights, psychiatry, and government reforms related to healthcare. It targets Danish citizens, healthcare professionals, and policymakers, providing news, publications, and official statements. The ministry holds a strong national position as a government authority with a large organizational size and consistent branding. Technically, the website is built on ASP.NET Web Forms using the GoBasic CMS platform, incorporating jQuery and standard web technologies. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, though performance is moderate. The infrastructure appears stable but could benefit from modern security headers and enhanced cookie consent mechanisms. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses secure form tokens, but lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is good with a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy, though no active consent mechanism is present. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are absent, which could be improved to enhance trust. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional, reflecting its government status. The absence of WHOIS data is noted but does not detract from legitimacy given the official content and domain. Strategic improvements in security headers, cookie consent, and transparency around incident response would further strengthen the security posture and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Unregistered MX Record

      MX record points to unregistered domain:

      What to do: Remove or fix MX record pointing to unregistered domain

      • RFC 5321 §5.1
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching oim.dk

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
95
Email security
65
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The ministry operates as a government entity focusing on healthcare and internal affairs in Denmark. Its market position is authoritative and essential, providing policy frameworks, public health information, and regulatory oversight. The business model is non-commercial, funded by the government, with key services including health reform initiatives, patient rights advocacy, and digital health transformation. The ministry collaborates with multiple official agencies, as evidenced by linked partner domains. Growth indicators are aligned with national health priorities and reforms. The website supports transparency and public engagement but lacks commercial revenue streams or affiliate partnerships.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and secure form handling. However, the lack of security headers such as CSP and X-Frame-Options represents a moderate risk for cross-site scripting and clickjacking attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are published, limiting transparency and readiness communication. Privacy policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, but the absence of a cookie consent banner may be a compliance gap. No vulnerable libraries or exposed credentials were found. Overall, the security maturity is good but can be enhanced by adopting recommended headers and publishing security contact information.

Recommendations

  1. Implement Content-Security-Policy and other security headers to mitigate XSS and clickjacking risks.
  2. Add a cookie consent mechanism to comply fully with GDPR cookie requirements.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Provide clear incident response contact information to enhance trust and readiness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party links and scripts to ensure ongoing security and privacy compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Indenrigs- og Sundhedsministeriet
Description
Vi bidrager til udviklingen af et sundt Danmark. Seneste nyt og pressemeddelelser om aktuelle temaer
Key services
Health policy development, Public health information, Patient rights, Psychiatry, Digitalization of health services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
ASP.NET, jQuery, GoBasic CMS
Frameworks
ASP.NET Web Forms
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure form with anti-forgery tokens (__VIEWSTATE, __VIEWSTATEGENERATOR)

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Official Danish government ministry website with comprehensive health and internal affairs content.
  2. No WHOIS data available from DK registry query; possibly due to registry policy or query limitations.
  3. No visible security headers detected; HTTPS is enforced.
  4. No cookie consent banner detected despite cookie policy page.
  5. No terms of service page found.
  6. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. Website uses ASP.NET Web Forms with GoBasic CMS and jQuery.
  8. Content is in Danish with some English navigation option.
  9. Contact info includes official email and phone number in footer.
  10. External links point to official Danish health and government agencies.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses ASP.NET Web Forms with GoBasic CMS and jQuery, indicating a mature but somewhat legacy technology stack. The HTML is valid and includes meta tags for SEO and social sharing (Open Graph, Twitter cards). The site is mobile responsive and accessible with skip links and ARIA labels. Performance is moderate, likely due to server-side rendering and multiple CSS/JS assets. No modern JavaScript frameworks detected. Hosting provider details are not explicit. The site could benefit from modernization efforts to improve speed and security, including HTTP/2 adoption and enhanced caching strategies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with oim.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review oim.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.